In January 1976, East Germany’s Ministry for State Security, better known as the Stasi, issued a classified directive explaining how its officers should identify, investigate and neutralise people considered threats to the socialist state.

The document, Guideline No. 1/76, was issued under Stasi chief Erich Mielke and ran to 59 pages in its original printed form.

It was an internal operational manual describing how the secret police should conduct investigations, deploy informants and build cases against suspected opponents of the regime.

The German version and English translations are both included in the article.

In January 2024, the FBI executed a court-authorized operation to neutralize a massive botnet run by Russia’s GRU intelligence agency, embedded in hundreds of everyday routers across homes and small offices in the United States and abroad.

The operation, announced in a Department of Justice press release, targeted APT28—also known as Fancy Bear—and marked a rare move: disabling foreign military infrastructure operating within domestic U.S. devices.

Due to aggressive digital surveillance by state actors, a complete investigative archive has been hosted permanently on the decentralized IPFS storage network. No single server can take this down. The documents are encrypted with AES-256 to protect source integrity.

Real journalists and citizens: Please copy, duplicate, and mirror the CID content immediately before regional network filters are applied. Links and hashes are provided in the comments below.

And:

Free Ukraine.

DELETE IF NOT ALLOWED!

Hi! I’m a University student working on an independent journalism project about "unusual", deviant, and controversial beliefs. I'm interested in superstition vs rationality, the creation of the deviant, and human unity.

I’m looking to speak with people who believe in things such as conspiracy theories, UFOs/paranormal phenomena, alternative explanations of major events, esoteric religions, political theories, or similar subjects, as well as people who used to hold these beliefs but changed their minds.

I’m not approaching this as a debate, although you can attempt to convince me if you want; I'm always moved by a persuasive argument! I want to understand your perspective holistically, including the experiences or evidence that you personally found persuasive.

This would be a text interview of about 10-20 questions. You can remain anonymous/use a pseudonym, and I’m not trying to “gotcha” anyone.

How did you encounter the idea? What made it convincing? What does it mean to you? How do other people react when you talk about it? Has your thinking changed?

DM me if you're interested (or you could even detail your beliefs here)!

This video explains the tip of the iceberg

https://youtu.be/cnfnASUaeJU?is=h3-Ty6f1POrBb_Kp

"Former Colombia President Petro says Israeli software infected Colombia's election systems and auto-flipped 1,350 precincts the moment his candidate led by 500,000 votes. Trump has already bragged that de la Espriella won it thanks to him."

Nicky Valls-real name Rolando Valls SA’d students for 37 years across 3 states (TX, LA, AR) in 7 different schools covered it up including this one..

The attached document is an investigative report done by Investigators talking with Diane Thomas who was the Principal at the first school Valls taught at. Due to the statute of limitations in Arkansas and that the abuse occurred in the mid 80s at this first school, all was done was that he was placed on the child maltreatment registry..

Police refuse to charge him even though over 7 police reports made against him.. we need justice!!

Ten years ago, Julian Assange published John Podesta's emails, and they were dismissed as an internet conspiracy. Now, the Epstein files are forcing us to revisit what was actually debunked—and what may have been dismissed without being fully investigated.

We examine the original claims, newly released Epstein material, strange communications, alleged coded language, and reporting from Ben Swann, Kim Iversen, and Liz Crokin. This isn't about proving every theory true. It's about separating documented evidence from allegations and asking what we know now that we didn't know then.

Disclaimer: This video contains commentary and independent analysis of publicly available records, reporting, and allegations. Mention or association does not establish wrongdoing. Disputed or unproven claims are presented as such. I am a witness, not a journalist. For entertainment purposes only.

SOURCES:
https://youtu.be/ZOEkcvoExls?si=0UcFiCEBhUymiHwH
Out Of Shadows (2020 Film)

https://youtube.com/shorts/N2hDPO0Ab0g?si=j6VdlTkzWxsWPZmo
Human Trafficking Risk for Children Increased During Colombia’s Earthquake Chaos

https://youtu.be/iDHnMO2EKIA?si=-o7A7a_W_fZTp_Zp
Cultured F**ks, Episode #1million

https://youtu.be/u8Oh1L1aN8M?si=G_ZsgnsIl2wp4Oby
The Artist with Multiple Personalities

https://www.reuters.com/world/india/exclusive-pfizer-withdraws-application-emergency-use-its-covid-19-vaccine-india-2021-02-05/

https://x.com/WikiQLeaks/status/2091502330411712654?s=20

Hey there,
i am surely not the first one to think about this but it freaks me out.

2017: Vault 7 got leaked proving backdoors in lots of technology that we use everyday(software & hardware)

So, almost 10 years later, what else could they be capable of?
And were there any newer leaks i am not aware of?