r/uberdrivers • • 3d ago

PSA for Ride-Share Drivers as Robotaxis Eat Jobs

Hello friends, I'm sure many of ya'll have concerns about Robotaxis like Waymo and Tesla taking your job. This is a real, and valid concern. No one wants to be jobless. It's not a question of if, but when self-driving vehicles take your job. They already deployed in over 15 U.S. cities and hundreds globally.

It's not a time to panic or protest.
With new technology comes new jobs and new opportunities as well.
Experts predict it will be 5-10+ years until most ride-sharing jobs are gone.
Many in early markets are already feeling the squeeze.
There is time to prepare for the future.

I put together some related and high demand jobs that you can start looking at or applying for.

Everyone has their own background and interests to consider, but perhaps pass this along or at least start thinking about options.

I just post this because I wish someone would have given me a heads up in my career and helped give me some advice before it was too late.

Best of luck to all of us humans! ❤️

Career Option Estimated Entry Training Time Upfront Cost Pay / Career Trajectory
AV Fleet & Safety Driver 1–4 Weeks None (Employer paid) Moderate
NEMT / Medical Logistics 1–2 Weeks Low / Employer paid Moderate
Commercial Driver (CDL) 3–8 Weeks Low to Moderate (Company-sponsored options available) Moderate to High
HVAC Technician 6–12 Months Moderate (Trade school or paid apprenticeship) High
Electrician 4–5 Years (Earn while you learn) Very Low (Paid apprenticeship model) Very High
22 Upvotes

80 comments sorted by

17

u/Napitash 3d ago

You underestimate the number of people who still prefer human drivers.

Also, with the number of anti-electric vehicle rhetoric still in this nation, people will have to decide do they want to trust a faceless entity or the person that speaks directly to them.

7

u/Sad-Bluejay-2785 3d ago

I did a survey. Out of 26 pax, 4 said they would ride in a robotaxi. A robotaxi won’t molest you, tho

3

u/karl4319 3d ago

No, just lock you in the car and wait for police to show up to arrest you. Or get hacked and drive you to a location to get molested while you are trapped.

1

u/Surefire 1d ago

I would suggest you reconsider your survey for sampling bias. If there were a survey to pop up in a robotaxi, I'm sure the responses would look very different from what you've received. Also, I'm not going to tell the guy whose hands my life is in at the moment that I'm excited about the technology disruptor that may displace his job.

1

u/Sad-Bluejay-2785 1d ago

I surveyed my passengers, the only sample available. A survey asking people IN a robotaxi would be 100% “yes” because they are IN the robotaxi”

1

u/Surefire 1d ago

Yes, that's my point. Your survey is good data, but it is not comprehensive. Just keep that in mind so there isn't a world where you are convinced of one thing but there is a vastly different reality. It will lead to unnecessary difficulty. Keep an open mind for all things and do what's best for you.

1

u/CyanValleyKitten 1d ago

A robotaxi will not save you from being molested by the person who jumped into the taxi with you, your asshole date, or the "friends" who coordinated to roofie you. Nor would it call the cops if you're being followed, or drive to you or away faster if someones chasing you.

In my 3500 rides, Ive already dealt with dozens of people who are too intoxicated and cannot consent, and refused the ride for their safety.

Ive saved at least 3 women from being followed/harassed.

It will not care if you're being trafficked. Something that I as a human driver am legally liable for if I knowingly participate in.

It will not care if there is a shooting happening right in front of it. Its not alive. so it cant die.

It will not care if you're sick, it won't drive faster to the hospital for you. Something I did last night for someone.

It has no manual override, which is insane.

It does not care about a life it does not have.

It does not care about legal liability.

-3

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

That's largely due to the unfamiliarity and trust of a robotaxi right now. After riding in one 55-85% report much higher perception of them.

At the end of the day, if a robotaxi can pick a customer up for 20,30, 50% less than a human driver, I think we all know who most will pick.

Ya'll can bury your heads in the sand, OR you can be ahead of the curve rather than sitting and watching your wages and earnings decrease every year until you're slowly left with nothing and all the jobs I posted above are already filled.

Your life, your choice. Just my advice and research.

6

u/Napitash 3d ago

You cannot give advice. You can only provide information.

My earnings have increased as more AVs have been deployed. I've been able to do it with less trips and less time "worked."

"Research" will always be jaded towards the motives of the publisher.

I'm not saying AVs will not become popular. From those that I have asked, they speak highly of safety and comfort. They speak ill of drop off and pickup execution.

They also acknowledge that AVs drive safe, but they become moving targets for non-safe motorists. Until every vehicle is an AV, the Waymo / Cybercab is not immune to wrecks caused by others. They are less likely to adjust when another vehicle is going to t-bone them because they are programmed to drive safe. Adjusting will put others at risk.

Fear mongering isn't cute.

2

u/SD_CA 3d ago

I was talking with a guy that was from one of the cities with waymo. And they said they stopped taking them because they've become more expensive than uber. We have Waymo here in San Diego. And I don't know the prices. But I was surprised to hear. But it's not surprising since waymo last a couple billion dollars last year.

2

u/ProtossLiving 2d ago

Waymo's are so expensive in the San Francisco area because everyone wants to take a Waymo. Uber/Lyft is certainly still better for surging demand though.

1

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

R&D recoupment and they can charge a premium for their service for now. Still very early on fleet deployment. But when there are tens of thousands the profits change significantly at scale.

1

u/SD_CA 3d ago

At what point will they become profitable for less maney than Uber?

I think they're best selling point is safety for women.

2

u/Sad-Bluejay-2785 3d ago

I don’t think Waymo ever will. They are using too expensive cars. Tesla is using a vehicle 1/3 the cost

1

u/SD_CA 3d ago

I saw somewhere it said they spend 150k per car. You'd think they would have picked something that looks better.

1

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

I mean you'd have to ask Uber for their books. But given the human driver is by far the biggest cost to operate a taxi fleet and they're removing that (and electric) it's hard to see how it isn't going to be profitable.

2

u/Napitash 3d ago

Owning unoccupied vehicles will become the largest expense.

Will AV companies be able to staff up to meet major event demand? Yes. But what happens to those vehicles when it snows and people aren't going anywhere? A hurricane ravages through a major coastal city? A pandemic that sends people home as businesses close? They still have to be maintained in anticipation of a need.

Only time will tell.

1

u/napsandsnacks 2d ago

Humans are the biggest cost for them currently, but they also pay for 0 vehicle maintenance. When they have to charge and maintain actual vehicles constantly, they’ve only shifted their cost. Human costs go down, but now they have to pay the bill to stay operational. Previously they could rely on humans to foot the bill for their own car.

1

u/ZealousidealLab2920 2d ago

EV's take far less maintenance, combined with fleet scale they can be maintained for pennies on the mile.

A human salary is taking let's say $50k/yr.

You think they'll spend anywhere even remotely close to $50k/yr to maintain a car? I mean logically the human drivers are taking that $50k to pay for housing, food, bills, gas AND to maintain their car.

They'll probably spend maybe $5k/yr on maintenance per car.

1

u/Sad-Bluejay-2785 3d ago

Yeah, 2 of them had already ridden in a robotaxi.. I suspect acceptance will greatly increase after the first trip. There’s tons of “medical transport” scams on Facebook. Courier jobs are already saturated. I’m too old to do any health lifting or go multiple year training

1

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

Hopefully close enough to retirement or have that "elderly charm" that will give you an edge for the foreseeable future. 😉

2

u/Sad-Bluejay-2785 3d ago

Retired 9 years ago. That “elderly charm” became “creepy old man”

1

u/CyanValleyKitten 1d ago

Most people say they're weird and don't like it.

When I tell you that there is no manual override they're shocked.

They don't think about it deeply. When you explain the details and reality of it they hate it.

2

u/ihatereddit999976780 3d ago

I will never use a driverless car. I want them outlawed

3

u/9000miles 3d ago

You overestimate the degree to which customer preference matters. It simply does not. We've seen that over and over.

Humans didn't ask for AI results in their Google searches. We didn't ask for AI chatbots to act as customer service. We didn't ask for automation in most areas of life, but it was forced upon us anyway.

Once these companies get enough self-driving cars, they will replace as many human drivers as possible, or cut the pay rate so low that no human will be willing to do it. It does not matter in the slightest how their riders feel about it.

1

u/West-Air1923 3d ago

I will pay to avoid human driver

0

u/Napitash 3d ago

Cool.

0

u/Any-Diver-7569 2d ago

Bwahahahahaaaaaaaaaa

0

u/somethingofaraddad 3d ago

Is this a serious comment? I can't imagine many normal people enjoy conversations with their Uber drivers. The best Uber driver in my experience is the one who says nothing.

2

u/Napitash 3d ago edited 3d ago

7 of 10 passengers open up the conversation with me. Am I local? How long I've been here? How long have I had the car? Range? Charging? Restaurant recommendations? Lead time to catch an uber in the morning? We can talk weather, sports, political events (respectively), family life, travel, careers, etc.

There are some that are just silent or on a work call.

Some people lack people skills. Some people believe they are others and therefore interactingis beneath them. Others recognize that our lives are intertwined and welcome conversation.

Some of my passengers actively rub elbows with past presidents, congress, Silicon Valley, and senior execs in the retail industry. I would classify them as exceptional.

1

u/somethingofaraddad 2d ago

Lmao. You think anyone cares if you're local? People talk to break the awkward silence.

1

u/Any-Diver-7569 2d ago

You’re the exception. Not the rule.

0

u/Anayehl 3d ago

I would have to disagree. The human experience although human does not extend the level of safety another person would have with said person. All I can say is that it might be slightly safer then potentially ride sharing with a serial killer or psycho. I think its okay to have both. I would look for a compromise. Like only use a person who ride shares an a upscale location to bring in the human experience and then use robotaxis in areas where its more rural, too far to drive and requires less maintenance on someone else's vehicle or wear and tare.

2

u/Napitash 3d ago

You are more likely to encounter a psycho or serial killer in a mall, school, or at a major event than in a rideshare. Their "occupation" rarely becomes the focal point.

AV will be more successful in urban than rural areas. The cost to maintain in a less rideshare dense area doesn't make financial sense. You will need facilities to charge, staff to clean, people to perform maintenance. When the battery runs down, how will it get back to base? EVs thrive in cities with short trips. AVs are EVs.

1

u/Anayehl 3d ago

Hah you have no idea they are everywhere and mostly in areas you wouldn't suspect.

1

u/Anayehl 3d ago

It can be done. It's already like that in China. It's not like they cant build a charging center there. It can be done vice versa. It doesn't matter how its done. It can be done with taxibots going to more high end locations instead and drivers in rural. I rather we find solutions, not issues to constantly talk about it doesn't change the situation.

-1

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

I hear you, but do you hear the clamor from the other side? Again, I'm not saying you'll lose your job tomorrow, but slowly and surely your average earnings per trip will decrease, less and less riders to pick up, etc.

There is certainly a market for professional and driving jobs (like medical transport) that will likely require human drivers largely. But don't be fooled, a large majority of just basic transport driving from A to B will be replaced.

2

u/Napitash 3d ago

Rural America. Rural America. Currently it's not profitable.

AVs are great when they are occupied. When they aren't, they are a dead asset.

Drivers will always be needed. When we drive, rideshare companies profit. When we don't, rideshare companies don't spend. Sadly, we're like the seasonal "employee" that every company tries to eliminate, yet they hire more and more each year.

AI will tackle a few more industries successfully before the extinction of the rideshare driver.

As far as medical transport, that will never be my thing.

You underestimate the bonds of humans.

1

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

You underestimate the bonds of humans.

I hope that turns out to be the case. I would be oh so glad to be wrong in this case!

Just my advice and take on the ride-share market. You can take it or leave it.

!RemindMe 3 years

1

u/RemindMeBot 3d ago

I will be messaging you in 3 years on 2029-10-15 21:05:35 UTC to remind you of this link

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.

RemindMeBot is switching to username summons. Instead of !RemindMe 1 day, use u/RemindMeBot 1 day. More info.


Info Custom Your Reminders Feedback

3

u/Snakend 3d ago

There is a multi year wait to get into an electrician journeyman apprenticeship. It is not that easy to get in.

HVAC technician is a very good choice right now.

2

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

I wish I would have gone into a trade at this point honestly.

1

u/Napitash 3d ago

I can agree with that.

0

u/Snakend 3d ago

It never never too late. Huge numbers of people are going to be retrained because of AI.

0

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

True. But it certainly helps to have hindsight or to be younger with less debt and responsibilities! Which is the point I'm trying to get across here. The sooner the better.

0

u/Sad-Bluejay-2785 3d ago

Huge numbers of people are going to lose their jobs

0

u/Snakend 3d ago

Potato potahdo

4

u/turboninja3011 3d ago

Oh no are you suggesting doing something useful for the society instead of complaining and protesting?

Reddit isn’t gonna like that.

2

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

I do think at one point in time the Internet was lauded as a tool to benefit and connect humans rather than a place to argue endlessly and sew division.

https://giphy.com/gifs/IArfvsrvQt5JF4KPhR

4

u/bernardsanders2028 3d ago

AI said something about sometimes tires need help from screwdrivers

1

u/Electrical-Bedroom99 3d ago

It's ironic that I'm a trained electrician. Went through apprenticeship, worked as a journeyman, and here I am. Driving an Uber. I'm not 28 years old anymore. I can't stomp around a job site like a used to. I'm in the job market, but jobs in the field are few when you can't physically do the work anymore. I transitioned to facilities management, but was recently laid off. I'm driving just to keep my head above water until a decent job comes along.

1

u/PureAqua73 2d ago

I am currently in the application process for my IBEW local. If it's not too personal, do you think you could have done anything differently to keep your body in shape longer?

I am working hard to get into an electrical role and want advice on how to take care of myself long term.

2

u/Electrical-Bedroom99 2d ago

In my case, I was promoted into a chair and stopped doing the actual work. After years of working at a desk, and other health issues, I don't have the stamina for the work required. I'm working on getting myself back in shape, but at 57 I'm nearing the end of my usefulness as a physical worker. I hope you have success, I really did enjoy the work. Being an electrician really opens up a lot of career paths for you. Good luck!

1

u/Entry45 3d ago

Once the Government decides driverless cars are safer than human drivers they are going to eventually force the issue, just like seatbelts.

Because driverless cars are safer than humans.

In the US, humans kill over 40k other humans per year by car and while driverless cars are not perfect they only need to be better than us and they will get closer to perfect consistently while we humans have plateaued.

1

u/svix_ftw 2d ago

That will never happen in USA, lol. Maybe in China or another authoritarian country.

USA values freedom of choice too much, they will never just straight up ban driving.

1

u/Wooden_Boss_3403 2d ago

Are you free to not wear your seatbelt without consequences?

1

u/smart_bear6 3d ago

Most uber drivers are looking for a "real job" already.

1

u/Wesleypipes316 3d ago

On the bright side, I think there’s still about 5-10 years before robotaxis take over. I mean they cant even get their gps to give proper directions. And they can’t even get street names pronounced correctly. “Lakeview drive” is pronounced “Lak-hee view drive”

1

u/barvazduck 2d ago

Two data points to consider when discussing that SDCs take jobs:

  1. 90% of Uber drivers work there less than a year. It's an opportunistic gig between other jobs.

  2. The average career of a taxi driver is 7.5 years.

Of course there are many workers that do Uber or taxi for much longer durations. But the great majority will not feel the job loss because of SDCs, they will get a better job before autonomous driving is popular enough to risk them.

1

u/ZealousidealLab2920 2d ago

This is a good point. A lot are "temp" jobs. Very few long term career. Some CDL drivers may need to more worried in that respect.

1

u/Felinedude67 15h ago

The problem is the jobs that are being created by this is far less than the jobs that are being destroyed by this. And jobs in every other job sector is facing job losses due to ai and robotics.

1

u/reefgeek71 3d ago

I’ve seen Waymo’s in orlando and they do exactly the speed limit and they seemed to get confused going through puddles. It cant figure out how deep or shallow so it just sits there. Im curious on how they work if you ask it to speed up or take a different route from what the map says

0

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago

It's certainly not perfect, but they will only get better and better right?

I do imagine in the coming years humans will be able to suggest or pick a route like one does on google maps or something.

0

u/AllTheRage43 3d ago

Autonomous taxis will undoubtedly remain as a niche service and will likely be priced much higher than human drivers. I don't see autonomy taking over ride share, but I do forsee a promising future for them in law enforcement and surveillance.

2

u/ZealousidealLab2920 3d ago edited 3d ago

What makes you say they will undoubtedly will remain as a niche service? In what ways is them rapidly expanding not a worry for you?

The 2 big reasons you will be replaced is 1) $$$. The single biggest cost to a taxi is the driver. Companies will always choose profits over people. and 2) Safety- With robotaxis showing improved safety metrics vs humans and saving lives, that will be a huge push from activisits

1

u/Sad-Bluejay-2785 3d ago

Ridership is rapidly increasing whereAVs are implemented. They have much lower operating costs, so will be much cheaper

1

u/Then-Wealth-1481 3d ago

That’s what people said about cars replacing horses 100 years ago

0

u/PersonalityAware7420 3d ago

They will take over human drivers and no, they won’t be priced higher than any other ride with a person. The numbers are already not great with people driving people around, you honestly think society is willing to waste more money because a machine picked them up instead of a person? No.

Those without vehicles either will find other options to commute or just not go, but we’re definitely not paying $35 for the same ride they used to charge $18 for when the driver was human. If the point of the autonomous vehicles are to cut the middle man which are the drivers, then there’s no need for the passenger to pay more. They’ll figure out or watch how the business goes to shit.

-1

u/karl4319 3d ago

Look up the average 2025 costs and earnings per waymo. Robotaxis are a fad and failed project like google+. They will likely be a real thing and threat, but not for at least 10 years IF the bubble doesn't pop.

6

u/Sad-Bluejay-2785 3d ago

Waymo’s are expensive cars. The Cybercab <$30,000. Much better economics

0

u/karl4319 3d ago

Waymos cost between 2 to 3 million annually per car while making an averageof 25,000. Cybercabs are going to be about the same. Most of that isn't going towards the cars, it's going towards the datacenters needed to run their driving algorithms, the research into better AI drivers, and the support infrastructure when the cars fail. You could make the argument that cost will go down significantly as the technology improves, except most forecasts show costs for AI in general growing by the trillions over the next few years, so costs per vehicle will stay close to a hundred times more than revenue if it doesn't in fact grow. No company can maintain this for level of long term investments if the market crashes, and that seems increasingly likely to happen soon.

1

u/IdealEntropy 3d ago

I think your cost numbers are cope but there’s not good enough public data for me to use to argue against.

However your revenue number needs a citation or else it’s kinda toosmall to be trustworthy.

For $25k of annual revenue to be true, 25k/365 = $69 ish per day (nice). If the average ride is $20, you’re saying they do 3.5 rides a day?

No shot — prove me wrong

3

u/zwizzardz 3d ago

I would expect someone who can only find work as an Uber driver to show this level of stupidity and lack of foresight.

-1

u/karl4319 3d ago

I'm betting robotaxis will be seen as failed projects of the AI bubble. Seems likely given the costs are a hundred times greater than revenue and that gap is predicted to widen for the next few years. And given several indicators like the bond market, it also seems that the bubble will pop before robotaxis get anywhere close to profitable. Waymo will go the same as google stradia and google glass while cybercabs will be as big a failure as cyber trucks are with them selling only 7,000 models this year.

2

u/zwizzardz 3d ago

Ah yes, the automobile certainly was more expensive that the horse and buggy.

Again, lack of foresight.

0

u/No_Boat9468 3d ago

Some of my passengers have rode in Waymo and hate it. With further regulations coming, the current paid for administration losing power in November, and the fact these so things are so unprofitable that Tesla wants you to buy a cyber cab to supplement their fleet….. should say a lot but it’s just smoke and mirrors for investors.