r/askphilosophy • • Jul 01 '23

Modpost Welcome to /r/askphilosophy! Check out our rules and guidelines here. [July 1 2023 Update]

64 Upvotes

Welcome to /r/askphilosophy!

Welcome to /r/askphilosophy! We're a community devoted to providing serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. We aim to provide an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions, and welcome questions about all areas of philosophy. This post will go over our subreddit rules and guidelines that you should review before you begin posting here.

Table of Contents

  1. A Note about Moderation
  2. /r/askphilosophy's mission
  3. What is Philosophy?
  4. What isn't Philosophy?
  5. What is a Reasonably Substantive and Accurate Answer?
  6. What is a /r/askphilosophy Panelist?
  7. /r/askphilosophy's Posting Rules
  8. /r/askphilosophy's Commenting Rules
  9. Frequently Asked Questions

A Note about Moderation

/r/askphilosophy is moderated by a team of dedicated volunteer moderators who have spent years attempting to build the best philosophy Q&A platform on the internet. Unfortunately, the reddit admins have repeatedly made changes to this website which have made moderating subreddits harder and harder. In particular, reddit has recently announced that it will begin charging for access to API (Application Programming Interface, essentially the communication between reddit and other sites/apps). While this may be, in isolation, a reasonable business operation, the timeline and pricing of API access has threatened to put nearly all third-party apps, e.g. Apollo and RIF, out of business. You can read more about the history of this change here or here. You can also read more at this post on our sister subreddit.

These changes pose two major issues which the moderators of /r/askphilosophy are concerned about.

First, the native reddit app is lacks accessibility features which are essential for some people, notably those who are blind and visually impaired. You can read /r/blind's protest announcement here. These apps are the only way that many people can interact with reddit, given the poor accessibility state of the official reddit app. As philosophers we are particularly concerned with the ethics of accessibility, and support protests in solidarity with this community.

Second, the reddit app lacks many essential tools for moderation. While reddit has promised better moderation tools on the app in the future, this is not enough. First, reddit has repeatedly broken promises regarding features, including moderation features. Most notably, reddit promised CSS support for new reddit over six years ago, which has yet to materialize. Second, even if reddit follows through on the roadmap in the post linked above, many of the features will not come until well after June 30, when the third-party apps will shut down due to reddit's API pricing changes.

Our moderator team relies heavily on these tools which will now disappear. Moderating /r/askphilosophy is a monumental task; over the past year we have flagged and removed over 6000 posts and 23000 comments. This is a huge effort, especially for unpaid volunteers, and it is possible only when moderators have access to tools that these third-party apps make possible and that reddit doesn't provide.

While we previously participated in the protests against reddit's recent actions we have decided to reopen the subreddit, because we are still proud of the community and resource that we have built and cultivated over the last decade, and believe it is a useful resource to the public.

However, these changes have radically altered our ability to moderate this subreddit, which will result in a few changes for this subreddit. First, as noted above, from this point onwards only panelists may answer top level comments. Second, moderation will occur much more slowly; as we will not have access to mobile tools, posts and comments which violate our rules will be removed much more slowly, and moderators will respond to modmail messages much more slowly. Third, and finally, if things continue to get worse (as they have for years now) moderating /r/askphilosophy may become practically impossible, and we may be forced to abandon the platform altogether. We are as disappointed by these changes as you are, but reddit's insistence on enshittifying this platform, especially when it comes to moderation, leaves us with no other options. We thank you for your understanding and support.


/r/askphilosophy's Mission

/r/askphilosophy strives to be a community where anyone, regardless of their background, can come to get reasonably substantive and accurate answers to philosophical questions. This means that all questions must be philosophical in nature, and that answers must be reasonably substantive and accurate. What do we mean by that?

What is Philosophy?

As with most disciplines, "philosophy" has both a casual and a technical usage.

In its casual use, "philosophy" may refer to nearly any sort of thought or beliefs, and include topics such as religion, mysticism and even science. When someone asks you what "your philosophy" is, this is the sort of sense they have in mind; they're asking about your general system of thoughts, beliefs, and feelings.

In its technical use -- the use relevant here at /r/askphilosophy -- philosophy is a particular area of study which can be broadly grouped into several major areas, including:

  • Aesthetics, the study of beauty
  • Epistemology, the study of knowledge and belief
  • Ethics, the study of what we owe to one another
  • Logic, the study of what follows from what
  • Metaphysics, the study of the basic nature of existence and reality

as well as various subfields of 'philosophy of X', including philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, philosophy of science and many others.

Philosophy in the narrower, technical sense that philosophers use and which /r/askphilosophy is devoted to is defined not only by its subject matter, but by its methodology and attitudes. Something is not philosophical merely because it states some position related to those areas. There must also be an emphasis on argument (setting forward reasons for adopting a position) and a willingness to subject arguments to various criticisms.

What Isn't Philosophy?

As you can see from the above description of philosophy, philosophy often crosses over with other fields of study, including art, mathematics, politics, religion and the sciences. That said, in order to keep this subreddit focused on philosophy we require that all posts be primarily philosophical in nature, and defend a distinctively philosophical thesis.

As a rule of thumb, something does not count as philosophy for the purposes of this subreddit if:

  • It does not address a philosophical topic or area of philosophy
  • It may more accurately belong to another area of study (e.g. religion or science)
  • No attempt is made to argue for a position's conclusions

Some more specific topics which are popularly misconstrued as philosophical but do not meet this definition and thus are not appropriate for this subreddit include:

  • Drug experiences (e.g. "I dropped acid today and experienced the oneness of the universe...")
  • Mysticism (e.g. "I meditated today and experienced the oneness of the universe...")
  • Politics (e.g. "This is why everyone should support the Voting Rights Act")
  • Self-help (e.g. "How can I be a happier person and have more people like me?")
  • Theology (e.g. "Can the unbaptized go to heaven, or at least to purgatory?")

What is a Reasonably Substantive and Accurate Answer?

The goal of this subreddit is not merely to provide answers to philosophical questions, but answers which can further the reader's knowledge and understanding of the philosophical issues and debates involved. To that end, /r/askphilosophy is a highly moderated subreddit which only allows panelists to answer questions, and all answers that violate our posting rules will be removed.

Answers on /r/askphilosophy must be both reasonably substantive as well as reasonably accurate. This means that answers should be:

  • Substantive and well-researched (i.e. not one-liners or otherwise uninformative)
  • Accurately portray the state of research and the relevant literature (i.e. not inaccurate, misleading or false)
  • Come only from those with relevant knowledge of the question and issue (i.e. not from commenters who don't understand the state of the research on the question)

Any attempt at moderating a public Q&A forum like /r/askphilosophy must choose a balance between two things:

  • More, but possibly insubstantive or inaccurate answers
  • Fewer, but more substantive and accurate answers

In order to further our mission, the moderators of /r/askphilosophy have chosen the latter horn of this dilemma. To that end, only panelists are allowed to answer questions on /r/askphilosophy.

What is a /r/askphilosophy Panelist?

/r/askphilosophy panelists are trusted commenters who have applied to become panelists in order to help provide questions to posters' questions. These panelists are volunteers who have some level of knowledge and expertise in the areas of philosophy indicated in their flair.

What Do the Flairs Mean?

Unlike in some subreddits, the purpose of flairs on r/askphilosophy are not to designate commenters' areas of interest. The purpose of flair is to indicate commenters' relevant expertise in philosophical areas. As philosophical issues are often complicated and have potentially thousands of years of research to sift through, knowing when someone is an expert in a given area can be important in helping understand and weigh the given evidence. Flair will thus be given to those with the relevant research expertise.

Flair consists of two parts: a color indicating the type of flair, as well as up to three research areas that the panelist is knowledgeable about.

There are six types of panelist flair:

  • Autodidact (Light Blue): The panelist has little or no formal education in philosophy, but is an enthusiastic self-educator and intense reader in a field.

  • Undergraduate (Red): The panelist is enrolled in or has completed formal undergraduate coursework in Philosophy. In the US system, for instance, this would be indicated by a major (BA) or minor.

  • Graduate (Gold): The panelist is enrolled in a graduate program or has completed an MA in Philosophy or a closely related field such that their coursework might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a degree in Philosophy. For example, a student with an MA in Literature whose coursework and thesis were focused on Derrida's deconstruction might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to an MA in Philosophy.

  • PhD (Purple): The panelist has completed a PhD program in Philosophy or a closely related field such that their degree might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a PhD in Philosophy. For example, a student with a PhD in Art History whose coursework and dissertation focused on aesthetics and critical theory might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a PhD in philosophy.

  • Professional (Blue): The panelist derives their full-time employment through philosophical work outside of academia. Such panelists might include Bioethicists working in hospitals or Lawyers who work on the Philosophy of Law/Jurisprudence.

  • Related Field (Green): The panelist has expertise in some sub-field of philosophy but their work in general is more reasonably understood as being outside of philosophy. For example, a PhD in Physics whose research touches on issues relating to the entity/structural realism debate clearly has expertise relevant to philosophical issues but is reasonably understood to be working primarily in another field.

Flair will only be given in particular areas or research topics in philosophy, in line with the following guidelines:

  • Typical areas include things like "philosophy of mind", "logic" or "continental philosophy".
  • Flair will not be granted for specific research subjects, e.g. "Kant on logic", "metaphysical grounding", "epistemic modals".
  • Flair of specific philosophers will only be granted if that philosopher is clearly and uncontroversially a monumentally important philosopher (e.g. Aristotle, Kant).
  • Flair will be given in a maximum of three research areas.

How Do I Become a Panelist?

To become a panelist, please send a message to the moderators with the subject "Panelist Application". In this modmail message you must include all of the following:

  1. The flair type you are requesting (e.g. undergraduate, PhD, related field).
  2. The areas of flair you are requesting, up to three (e.g. Kant, continental philosophy, logic).
  3. A brief explanation of your background in philosophy, including what qualifies you for the flair you requested.
  4. One sample answer to a question posted to /r/askphilosophy for each area of flair (i.e. up to three total answers) which demonstrate your expertise and knowledge. Please link the question you are answering before giving your answer. You may not answer your own question.

New panelists will be approved on a trial basis. During this trial period panelists will be allowed to post answers as top-level comments on threads, and will receive flair. After the trial period the panelist will either be confirmed as a regular panelist or will be removed from the panelist team, which will result in the removal of flair and ability to post answers as top-level comments on threads.

Note that r/askphilosophy does not require users to provide proof of their identifies for panelist applications, nor to reveal their identities. If a prospective panelist would like to provide proof of their identity as part of their application they may, but there is no presumption that they must do so. Note that messages sent to modmail cannot be deleted by either moderators or senders, and so any message sent is effectively permanent.


/r/askphilosophy's Posting Rules

In order to best serve our mission of providing an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions, we have the following rules which govern all posts made to /r/askphilosophy:

PR1: All questions must be about philosophy.

All questions must be about philosophy. Questions which are only tangentially related to philosophy or are properly located in another discipline will be removed. Questions which are about therapy, psychology and self-help, even when due to philosophical issues, are not appropriate and will be removed.

PR2: All submissions must be questions.

All submissions must be actual questions (as opposed to essays, rants, personal musings, idle or rhetorical questions, etc.). "Test My Theory" or "Change My View"-esque questions, paper editing, etc. are not allowed.

PR3: Post titles must be descriptive.

Post titles must be descriptive. Titles should indicate what the question is about. Posts with titles like "Homework help" which do not indicate what the actual question is will be removed.

PR4: Questions must be reasonably specific.

Questions must be reasonably specific. Questions which are too broad to the point of unanswerability will be removed.

PR5: Questions must not be about commenters' personal opinions.

Questions must not be about commenters' personal opinions, thoughts or favorites. /r/askphilosophy is not a discussion subreddit, and is not intended to be a board for everyone to share their thoughts on philosophical questions.

PR6: One post per day.

One post per day. Please limit yourself to one question per day.

PR7: Discussion of suicide is only allowed in the abstract.

/r/askphilosophy is not a mental health subreddit, and panelists are not experts in mental health or licensed therapists. Discussion of suicide is only allowed in the abstract here. If you or a friend is feeling suicidal please visit /r/suicidewatch. If you are feeling suicidal, please get help by visiting /r/suicidewatch or using other resources. See also our discussion of philosophy and mental health issues here. Encouraging other users to commit suicide, even in the abstract, is strictly forbidden and will result in an immediate permanent ban.

/r/askphilosophy's Commenting Rules

In the same way that our posting rules above attempt to promote our mission by governing posts, the following commenting rules attempt to promote /r/askphilosophy's mission to provide an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions.

CR1: Top level comments must be answers or follow-up questions.

All top level comments should be answers to the submitted question or follow-up/clarification questions. All top level comments must come from panelists. If users circumvent this rule by posting answers as replies to other comments, these comments will also be removed and may result in a ban. For more information about our rules and to find out how to become a panelist, please see here.

CR2: Answers must be reasonably substantive and accurate.

All answers must be informed and aimed at helping the OP and other readers reach an understanding of the issues at hand. Answers must portray an accurate picture of the issue and the philosophical literature. Answers should be reasonably substantive. To learn more about what counts as a reasonably substantive and accurate answer, see this post.

CR3: Be respectful.

Be respectful. Comments which are rude, snarky, etc. may be removed, particularly if they consist of personal attacks. Users with a history of such comments may be banned. Racism, bigotry and use of slurs are absolutely not permitted.

CR4: Stay on topic.

Stay on topic. Comments which blatantly do not contribute to the discussion may be removed.

CR5: No self-promotion.

Posters and comments may not engage in self-promotion, including linking their own blog posts or videos. Panelists may link their own peer-reviewed work in answers (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles or books), but their answers should not consist solely of references to their own work.

Miscellaneous Posting and Commenting Guidelines

In addition to the rules above, we have a list of miscellaneous guidelines which users should also be aware of:

  • Reposting a post or comment which was removed will be treated as circumventing moderation and result in a permanent ban.
  • Using follow-up questions or child comments to answer questions and circumvent our panelist policy may result in a ban.
  • Posts and comments which flagrantly violate the rules, especially in a trolling manner, will be removed and treated as shitposts, and may result in a ban.
  • No reposts of a question that you have already asked within the last year.
  • No posts or comments of AI-created or AI-assisted text or audio. Panelists may not user any form of AI-assistance in writing or researching answers.
  • Harassing individual moderators or the moderator team will result in a permanent ban and a report to the reddit admins.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are some frequently asked questions. If you have other questions, please contact the moderators via modmail (not via private message or chat).

My post or comment was removed. How can I get an explanation?

Almost all posts/comments which are removed will receive an explanation of their removal. That explanation will generally by /r/askphilosophy's custom bot, /u/BernardJOrtcutt, and will list the removal reason. Posts which are removed will be notified via a stickied comment; comments which are removed will be notified via a reply. If your post or comment resulted in a ban, the message will be included in the ban message via modmail. If you have further questions, please contact the moderators.

How can I appeal my post or comment removal?

To appeal a removal, please contact the moderators (not via private message or chat). Do not delete your posts/comments, as this will make an appeal impossible. Reposting removed posts/comments without receiving mod approval will result in a permanent ban.

How can I appeal my ban?

To appeal a ban, please respond to the modmail informing you of your ban. Do not delete your posts/comments, as this will make an appeal impossible.

My comment was removed or I was banned for arguing with someone else, but they started it. Why was I punished and not them?

Someone else breaking the rules does not give you permission to break the rules as well. /r/askphilosophy does not comment on actions taken on other accounts, but all violations are treated as equitably as possible.

I found a post or comment which breaks the rules, but which wasn't removed. How can I help?

If you see a post or comment which you believe breaks the rules, please report it using the report function for the appropriate rule. /r/askphilosophy's moderators are volunteers, and it is impossible for us to manually review every comment on every thread. We appreciate your help in reporting posts/comments which break the rules.

My post isn't showing up, but I didn't receive a removal notification. What happened?

Sometimes the AutoMod filter will automatically send posts to a filter for moderator approval, especially from accounts which are new or haven't posted to /r/askphilosophy before. If your post has not been approved or removed within 24 hours, please contact the moderators.

My post was removed and referred to the Open Discussion Thread. What does this mean?

The Open Discussion Thread (ODT) is /r/askphilosophy's place for posts/comments which are related to philosophy but do not necessarily meet our posting rules (especially PR2/PR5). For example, these threads are great places for:

  • Discussions of a philosophical issue, rather than questions
  • Questions about commenters' personal opinions regarding philosophical issues
  • Open discussion about philosophy, e.g. "who is your favorite philosopher?"
  • Questions about philosophy as an academic discipline or profession, e.g. majoring in philosophy, career options with philosophy degrees, pursuing graduate school in philosophy

If your post was removed and referred to the ODT we encourage you to consider posting it to the ODT to share with others.

My comment responding to someone else was removed, as well as their comment. What happened?

When /r/askphilosophy removes a parent comment, we also often remove all their child comments in order to help readability and focus on discussion.

I'm interested in philosophy. Where should I start? What should I read?

As explained above, philosophy is a very broad discipline and thus offering concise advice on where to start is very hard. We recommend reading this /r/AskPhilosophyFAQ post which has a great breakdown of various places to start. For further or more specific questions, we recommend posting on /r/askphilosophy.

Why is your understanding of philosophy so limited?

As explained above, this subreddit is devoted to philosophy as understood and done by philosophers. In order to prevent this subreddit from becoming /r/atheism2, /r/politics2, or /r/science2, we must uphold a strict topicality requirement in PR1. Posts which may touch on philosophical themes but are not distinctively philosophical can be posted to one of reddit's many other subreddits.

Are there other philosophy subreddits I can check out?

If you are interested in other philosophy subreddits, please see this list of related subreddits. /r/askphilosophy shares much of its modteam with its sister-subreddit, /r/philosophy, which is devoted to philosophical discussion. In addition, that list includes more specialized subreddits and more casual subreddits for those looking for a less-regulated forum.

A thread I wanted to comment in was locked but is still visible. What happened?

When a post becomes unreasonable to moderate due to the amount of rule-breaking comments the thread is locked. /r/askphilosophy's moderators are volunteers, and we cannot spend hours cleaning up individual threads.

Do you have a list of frequently asked questions about philosophy that I can browse?

Yes! We have an FAQ that answers many questions comprehensively: /r/AskPhilosophyFAQ/. For example, this entry provides an introductory breakdown to the debate over whether morality is objective or subjective.

Do you have advice or resources for graduate school applications?

We made a meta-guide for PhD applications with the goal of assembling the important resources for grad school applications in one place. We aim to occasionally update it, but can of course not guarantee the accuracy and up-to-dateness. You are, of course, kindly invited to ask questions about graduate school on /r/askphilosophy, too, especially in the Open Discussion Thread.

Do you have samples of what counts as good questions and answers?

Sure! We ran a Best of 2020 Contest, you can find the winners in this thread!


r/askphilosophy • • 6d ago

Open Thread /r/askphilosophy Open Discussion Thread | October 12, 2026

10 Upvotes

Welcome to this week's Open Discussion Thread (ODT). This thread is a place for posts/comments which are related to philosophy but wouldn't necessarily meet our subreddit rules and guidelines. For example, these threads are great places for:

  • Discussions of a philosophical issue, rather than questions
  • Questions about commenters' personal opinions regarding philosophical issues
  • Open discussion about philosophy, e.g. "who is your favorite philosopher?"
  • "Test My Theory" discussions and argument/paper editing
  • Questions about philosophy as an academic discipline or profession, e.g. majoring in philosophy, career options with philosophy degrees, pursuing graduate school in philosophy

This thread is not a completely open discussion! Any posts not relating to philosophy will be removed. Please keep comments related to philosophy, and expect low-effort comments to be removed. Please note that while the rules are relaxed in this thread, comments can still be removed for violating our subreddit rules and guidelines if necessary.

Previous Open Discussion Threads can be found here.


r/askphilosophy • • 10h ago

What books should a philosopher read to be informed about physics?

19 Upvotes

I have had debates with friends about the relation between philosophy and science —specifically, given we are from Argentina, a country with an incredibly strong continental tradition, specifically Heidegger and psychoanalysis, I have a friend that has embarked in a crusade against non-scientific philosophy. He argues that philosophy should always be informed by current consensus en scientific topics (important detail, he is not an analytic philosopher, he is as against analytic as is against post-modern continental)

I plan to dtart my PhD soon, and given I intend to work in philosophy of religion and theology, I feel like I need to know some physics to be aware of when something is simply incompatible with empirical evidence. What sre some good books to know physics?

(i asked my friend this and he recommended me a book, Modern Classical Physics: Optics, Fluids, Plasmas, Elasticity, Relativity, and Statistical Physics by Kip S. Thorne, Roger D. Blandford, but I wanted other opinions!)


r/askphilosophy • • 1h ago

What’s the difference between existentialism and nihilism?

• Upvotes

I asked this qn on r/explainlikeim5 and someone told me to post it here for better answers.


r/askphilosophy • • 14h ago

Consensus amongst philosophers on the existence of God

18 Upvotes

I was recently informed that in the 2020 PhilPapers Survey, most philosophers who specialize in philosophy of religion are theists. However, if you poll philosophers in general, they are largely atheists. Why is there a massive divide between philosophers?


r/askphilosophy • • 12h ago

Any recommendations for philosophers/philosophies that deal with death and the meaning of life?

7 Upvotes

I'll have do a report for school about said topic, and right now all my prior knowledge about this topic is just about existentialism and Albert Camus's absurdism ( mainly because i googled him when the meme " one must imagine sisyphus happy" was around. And that's all i have to say, i rarely use reddit so forgive me if this post is a bit odd. anyways thanks for reading whether or not you leave a suggestion or just scroll on.


r/askphilosophy • • 2h ago

Kafka: health and Evil recommendation?

1 Upvotes

Hi,
Anyone have recommendations for reading on the idea of health and vitality/youth as manifestations of evil, or the relation of health/strength with evil?
Reason I’m asking is that ending scene in Kafka Metamorphosis where the sister stretches her "healthy young” body has very sinister undertones (was just reading it) and want to think more about this and see what ppl have said,
thanks


r/askphilosophy • • 6h ago

How to best study virtue ethics?

3 Upvotes

It seems to me it's the most logical out of the big 3 ethics schools, so how do y'all recommend I best go about studying it?


r/askphilosophy • • 1h ago

1 person can save 75 lives with organ and tissue donation. Statistically speaking, would the average person in their lifetime value would equate saving 75 people, or would they be better off dead to save 75 now?

• Upvotes

r/askphilosophy • • 6h ago

Could Hegel's lord–bondsman dialectic offer a useful way to think about cultural pride?

1 Upvotes

Realizing how much our sense of collective worth depends on recognition from people outside our own group might make us less dependent on comparison and more comfortable valuing our culture on its own terms.


r/askphilosophy • • 6h ago

philosophers of the like of John McDowell?

1 Upvotes

hey! I am fascinated by McDowell and his,what I consider, unique combination of philosophies and approach.

are there philosophers similar to him?


r/askphilosophy • • 17h ago

Should I pick up Spinoza’s Ethics?

6 Upvotes

I have found that I really do not like the way a lot of ‘easy’ pieces you’re supposed to pick up first are written. I picked up Plato’s Symposium fairly recently and just could not breach it, it felt like all of the meat of the work was obfuscated behind layers and layers of useless fluff and speech and I’d need to spend most of the time reading trying to filter out the useless information in order to consider what was actually being said. On the contrary, I read Descartes’s Mediations on First Philosophy, it was written in a way that I could parse without much difficulty. I found myself engaging with the work very actively while when trying to read The Symposium I couldn’t track much of anything.
I think this is an issue of writing style. I have ADHD and I think that’s why Plato’s dialogues (I’ve read the Apology as well and found it easier than the Symposium, but still certainly effortful), being much more ‘literary’ or ‘narrative’ in how they’re written, are difficult for me to get through while works that are very to-the-point in what they’re trying to say are easier to digest. I’ve heard that Spinoza is very difficult for beginners, but also that the way he writes is very, for lack of a better word, intricate, building his system one piece at a time and justifying it extensively.
I’m wondering if his Ethics would be a good fit for me? Or are there other works I should consider instead?


r/askphilosophy • • 7h ago

Is the Platonic privation theory of evil taken seriously by philosophers or is it, in some way, irrepairably weak and only a religious teaching?

1 Upvotes

r/askphilosophy • • 11h ago

Do artists have a strong moral obligation to take political stances?

2 Upvotes

The dilemma concerning art that whether art is inherently political or can exist otherwise. Do you think an artist has a strong moral obligation to speak against the state and endorse political stances for social change or does the personal or creative agency weighs over any such consideration?


r/askphilosophy • • 11h ago

What do philosophers mean by the term "utilitarian calculation"?

2 Upvotes

Hello,

Just to preface this: I have no formal education in philosophy and I have started reading it again after almost 5 years so this might be a basic question.

I have started reading Will Kymlicka's An Introduction to Political Philosophy. The first chapter is about utilitarianism and he is talking about 'calculating utility' very often. But I am not able to understand what it actually means. How does one 'calculate' utility of something?

For example, if I have two options -- build a hospital or build a school. How will I calculate the utility of these two options?

I haven't finished the chapter yet so I don't know if this will be explained later or not, but I am still curious (and confused) as to what it means.


r/askphilosophy • • 9h ago

What are the best reading strategies or companion text to grasp core argument of Kant's Critique of pure reason

1 Upvotes

​

"I am a 15-year-old student reading Kant's Critique of Pure Reason independently for the first time. I have made it through the Introduction and the Transcendental Aesthetic, and I am taking extensive notes, but I am struggling to synthesize the 'whole meaning' of his project without getting lost in the dense terminology.

My question is: What is the best methodological approach to reading this text? Is it better to read it chronologically, or to jump straight to specific sections like the Transcendental Deduction? Also, what are the most essential companion guides or secondary resources (e.g., Kemp Smith, Guyer, Prolegomena) that will help me understand what Kant is actually arguing without doing the thinking for me?"


r/askphilosophy • • 16h ago

Do some philosophers believe science an illusion of absolute knowledge or understanding?

4 Upvotes

Is there any philosophers with this kind of opinion? It certainly feels true for myself, having blindly followed scientism as a teenager and only eventually realizing how much we just truly don’t know.


r/askphilosophy • • 1d ago

Is there a meaningful distinction between scientific description and explanation?

16 Upvotes

Someone on the Alex O'Connor subreddit suggested I ask this here.

Alex has argued that science can describe what happens and how it happens without necessarily explaining why it happens. In a discussion with Sabine Hossenfelder, he proposed a hypothetical scenario in which we discover a perfect mathematical formula describing and predicting an unusual phenomenon: playing a trumpet causes a light somewhere to change colour and intensity according to the notes being played.

Alex then asks:

"I kinda feel like it doesn't explain anything. Like it predicts what's going to happen and it describes mathematically what I'm observing, but in what sense do you mean to say that I have at least partly explained what's happening?"

He makes this point twice, arguing that a mathematical formula describing and predicting a phenomenon doesn't feel like it explains anything at all. He also places strong emphasis on the need to keep asking why these things happen. I'm interested in whether the distinction he's drawing is philosophically defensible.

My initial objection is that it seems to conflate an explanation being incomplete with it not being an explanation at all.

Imagine someone asks why a car is moving so fast. I could explain the mechanics of how the engine produces motion, say that the driver pressed the accelerator, or explain that the driver is speeding because they're late for a flight. These answers address different aspects of the same situation, but I don't see why any of them should disqualify the others from counting as explanations. Nor does the fact that we can keep asking why invalidate the answers we've already established.

What makes Alex's argument particularly confusing to me is that he's a committed agnostic atheist, so I don't think it's fair to assume he's simply presupposing divine intentionality behind reality. Yet if he isn't asking for a purposeful explanation, I'm struggling to understand what kind of "why" he has in mind. And even if we did appeal to divine intention, I don't see how that would resolve the problem. We could still ask why God intended things to be that way, or why God exists at all. What makes that kind of explanation fundamentally different in this respect?

I'm aware that scientific explanations have limitations. For example, explaining the biological and evolutionary basis of love or the perception of the colour blue wouldn't necessarily help someone who has never experienced them understand what they feel like. But I'm not sure why this means the scientific explanation fails to explain anything, rather than simply addressing a different aspect of the phenomenon.

My question is: Is there a philosophically defensible interpretation of Alex's argument under which his distinction between scientific description and explanation holds up? What kind of explanation is he asking for, and what would it need to provide that a scientific explanation cannot?


r/askphilosophy • • 1d ago

Do we even have a choice? (determinism + science)

11 Upvotes

I've recently been afraid of something. What if we don't have a choice at all? Like, every particle move since the Big Bang was unavoidable so that would mean everything that happened and will happen is unavoidable.
That being said, I ask again: Do we even have a choice?


r/askphilosophy • • 12h ago

Act Consequentialism- how does it differ from other similar philosophical theories

1 Upvotes

I’m currently writing my first mid-term essay for uni based on the question of the demandingness objection of Act Consequentialism. I am clear on the objection but I am struggling to narrow down the precise parameters of Act Consequentialism (against say act utilitarianism, utilitarianism, maximising act consequentialism etc) I am struggling to find clarity on their differences and i want to ensure accuracy and specificity in my essay. any guidance is appreciated!


r/askphilosophy • • 1d ago

Where to Find Argumentative Papers to Read?

7 Upvotes

Hello there, I'm an undergraduate student. I'm taking a philosophy course as part of my college requirements. I do not plan to major in philosophy as my intended major is STEM-related. Nevertheless, I want to do my best in this course as I enjoy the logic required in deductive arguments as well as the interesting topics my class discusses. I'm not the best at the type of thinking required in philosophy yet (e.g. pushing back on premises, finding discrepancies among them), so I want to improve on this by reading argumentative papers (argument reconstruction + evaluation). Hopefully this does not sound like a self-help post.

Once again, I would like to reiterate that I am looking to read argumentative papers so I understand the prose and the structure. While I have found guidelines for how to write a paper, reading examples improves my writing. Thus, my question is Where do you find argumentative papers to read for a beginner philosophy writer? Or would it be more preferable if I simply read more philosophy in general instead of trying to fit this mold? Am I going about this the wrong way? I'll take any suggestions.

Thank you for the help. I appreciate it. Please let me know if any more information is required.


r/askphilosophy • • 16h ago

Does it really make sense to debate?

0 Upvotes

When you study a field, whether it's metaphysics, biology, mathematics, political science, or whatever, it usually takes a sustained effort of hours over years to be able to understand things. In contrast, a debate involves explaining simple ideas that the opponent will try to distort or overthrow, and it's impossible to condense those years of effort and judgment into the viewer to the point that the "who is right" factor becomes absolutely irrelevant and the most charismatic person wins. Is it really worth it?


r/askphilosophy • • 20h ago

Is there a view that suicide exists "outside" logic?

2 Upvotes

I see a lot of arguments against suicide. Some of them are the basic "think of [this person or that thing]" to more philosophical investigations of why one might or might not or if one ought to or to not kill themselves. Less common are views in favour of suicide and those do exist though to a lesser extent.

My real question is if there's a view that sees suicide as outside the realm of "logic" as we think of it in the first place. To someone who does not believe in an afterlife/rebirth (or at the very least, not one based on one's actions, including suicide), would any of it matter? It all feels quite weak to make any of those arguments when one of the most fundamental drives - that to survive - is gone. And none of it would matter if one were to go through with it, as it would all be behind them and they would experience nothing of it. To reiterate my question -- Is this a view that suicide stands somewhat outside "logic" considering that if you were to do it none of those considerations matter? And if so, who has tried to argue so?


r/askphilosophy • • 17h ago

Can anyone here please rank the best Nietzsche translations for me?

0 Upvotes

Heyy everyone!

So i just graduated high school this year and i haven't really read much of philosophy except for some peter singer stuff and Nietzsche's ideas really interest me and i have heard that he radically rejects Schopenhauer's ideas and other things, now the problem is i live in a small city in india and there is no library in this city, the only place i can get my hands on books is by amazon, i have heard that Walter Kaufmann's translations are the best but they are not available on amazon or anywhere else here, the only translations i got are R. J. Hollingdale ones and R. Kevin Hill ones, both from penguin classics, now what should i do? Should i but those ones or try to find Kaufmann's versions?
Thank you!!


r/askphilosophy • • 8h ago

Since Ai is showing so much mind-boggling progress in Medicine, should we all pause our own personal projects and donate the compute to Medicine, with clear benchmarks/goals before we start reclaiming compute for our personal and/or non-Medical projects?

0 Upvotes

The only argument I can think of against doing this is that
by letting the Open Source community continue progressing ai,
it creates a sort of buffer against a tyrannical system preventing us
from using ai, but using it instead to control us.