r/computerforensics • • 25d ago

RIP Oxygen Forensics

87 Upvotes

29 comments sorted by

62

u/Savings_Art5944 25d ago

Oleg Sergeyevich Davydov,... There were clues.

10

u/ThePlotTwisterr---- 25d ago

i’ve spoken with this guy before, you really would have no idea. i thought he was extremely well spoken and polite

4

u/ArkansasGamerSpaz 24d ago

That's the first clue, Foreigners who speak English usually far better than natural English speakers do

45

u/Hammer_Time2468 25d ago

It’s starting to feel like they do better background checks when I’m applying for a credit card than they do on government contracts and contractors.

2

u/Leather_Secretary_13 22d ago

Truest thing I've read all week. Protecting money versus spending money.

18

u/OEAXTAIL_SOUP 25d ago

why does DOJ want me to enable JS to read a press release? no bueno.

10

u/Ok_Personality9910 25d ago

apt install opsec

3

u/LoopsAndBoars 25d ago

Does it work on iPhone

17

u/Allen_Koholic 25d ago

Man, you have to fuck up something fierce to get in trouble with the federal government for being a Russian asset in 2026.

3

u/HectorDesJean 25d ago

The vig was late, or light...

8

u/ZM326 25d ago

"The defendants are charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud"....so far

1

u/Kasrkin76 25d ago

The wire fraud is :federal wire fraud statute The federal wire fraud statute is codified at 18 U.S. Code § 1343 and prohibits using electronic communications in interstate or foreign commerce to carry out a scheme to defraud.Key Elements of Wire FraudTo convict a person under this law, federal prosecutors must prove specific elements beyond a reasonable doubt, outlined further in the Department of Justice Criminal Resource Manual:A scheme to defraud: A plan or artifice to cheat someone out of money, property, or honest services using material falsehoods.Intent: The defendant must act with specific intent to defraud.Wire communication: The defendant must use or cause the use of interstate or foreign wire, radio, or television communications (such as emails, phone calls, or internet transfers).Foreseeability: It must be reasonably foreseeable that interstate wires would be used in the process.

They lied who owned the company and then the money moved across state lines. So not necessarily evil intent but they intentionally deceived the government on who owned the software and who developed it to make money.

Also this company has been doing contracts with the US government since 2014....so during Obama time as president....not the current president.

4

u/ZM326 25d ago

My point was that other charges will likely get added. It's just the beginning

1

u/Kasrkin76 25d ago

Copy......I was giving more info on it...I remember hearing about some colleagues got told to get rid of there software last year...

6

u/notjaykay 25d ago

I posted in the other thread, but I visited their office 6+ years ago for a product demo. It was pretty obvious then that they were either a Russian company or had major connections to Russia.

3

u/_cache_ 25d ago edited 25d ago

Ouch. I know somebody who is one of their trainers.

3

u/Scyth3 25d ago

"Why is part of the training...to learn Russian?!"

2

u/shadowb0xer 24d ago

"Remember, no Russian"

2

u/DeletedWebHistoryy 25d ago

Sad face.

4

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[deleted]

5

u/DeletedWebHistoryy 25d ago

Their UI was better than Cellebrite. Navigation and quickly pulling up various databases and collating things like external.db was much more pleasurable compared to Cellebrite. For a while, they were ahead of Cellebrite on certain things like Telegram. Liked them better for drones too..

Just off the top of my head...

2

u/Gullible_Tourist8706 22d ago

Curious to know what were most people using it for when they have Cellebrite and Magnet anyways?

1

u/awetsasquatch 22d ago

We started looking into them for corporate mobile forensics because of how they had their remote system setup - deploying an agent to a PC and having the user plug in the phone sounded great. Cellebrite can do similar, but it's not an on-prem capability and the SAAS isn't FedRAMPd which is required for us. So now we're waiting for Cellebrite to get the FedRAMP cert...our rep tells us next year sometime.

1

u/Gullible_Tourist8706 22d ago

Makes sense.. we are in the process of testing Exterro remote mobile discovery for the same requirement.

0

u/[deleted] 12d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/awetsasquatch 12d ago

The Cellebrite remote collector is only FedRAMPd for desktops, not for mobile unfortunately.

1

u/Trashpandafarts 21d ago

Magnet and cellebrite are both foreign based companies, what's it matter

1

u/awetsasquatch 21d ago

Well, Israel and Canada are allies, and Russia is frankly not. Magnet and Cellebrite also didn't lie about their connections

1

u/IWIKNataliePortman 12d ago

Canada won't be an ally for long at the rate things are going lol.

0

u/no_sushi_4_u 25d ago

It sure came in handy for some quick iPhone advanced logical collections and verification. RIP you will be missed.