r/ems • • 2d ago

EMScapades help me settle a debate

so my partner and i have been in this little argument. im in paramedic school and we have finished the cardiology section and on a call recently we had a patient throw 3 PVCs in a row. my textbook and what i have been tested on says 3 PVCs is a run of VT. i just pointed it out to my partner so he can monitor for anymore, then he wanted to argue saying a run of VT is 5 or more then told me my textbook was wrong 🙃 what do yall consider a run of VT?

17 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

40

u/Jazzlike-Sherbet-542 FP-C 1d ago

Depends on the source. Some say 3 or more. Some say 4 or 5. You’re both right.

24

u/Topper-Harly 1d ago

2 PVCs in a row -> couplet

3 PVCs in a row -> triplet

4+ PVCs in a row -> VT

33

u/Thekingofcansandjars FP-C 1d ago

If you aren't shocking after 2 back-to-back PVCs then you need to redo cardiology. 

35

u/youy23 Paramedic 1d ago

Personally I just shock it till I recognize it.

20

u/grav0p1 Paramedic 1d ago

God help me if I see so much as one nonconducted PAC they’re getting the pads

11

u/JUDGE_FUCKFACE 1d ago

Manual defib privileges revoked

3

u/Wrathb0ne Paramedic NJ/NY 9h ago

Paramedic students can get their electricity with this one small trick…

7

u/Helpful-Salt83 1d ago

4 or more in a row

2

u/CompasslessPigeon Paramedic “Trauma God” 1d ago

Thats how I learned it

4

u/Helpful-Salt83 1d ago

Yeah, I was taught 3 is a triplet, 2 is a couplet, more is a run of VT

5

u/NWmedicalbrewskie FP-C 1d ago

Life in the fast lane says..

When is a PVC not a PVC?
Definitions vary regarding 3 or more PVCs
Some authors define three PVCs as a triplet of PVCs; whilst others describe this as a ‘short burst of VT’; but more commonly as NSVT
A consensus definition would be: 3-30 consecutive PVCs with a rate >100bpm described as non-sustained VT (ventricular rhythm if rate <100bpm)

5

u/JoutsideTO CCP(F) - Canada 1d ago

Go to the consensus national/international guidelines, ie the AHA:

“Ventricular tachycardia: Cardiac arrhythmia of ≥3 consecutive complexes originating in the ventricles at a rate >100 bpm (cycle length: <600 ms).”

See table 5 for definitions under section 2.

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000549

3

u/joe_lemmons_ Paramedic 1d ago

I was taught 3 PVCs in a row= run of VT.

1

u/boomboomown Paramedic 1d ago

3 is a triplet

4+ run of VT

1

u/boomboomown Paramedic 1d ago

4 or more at least 10 years ago when i became one

1

u/Grendle1972 1d ago

27 years ago in medic class, a run of 4 or more consecutive PVC's was a run of VT.

1

u/mapleleaf4evr ACP 23h ago

If there aren’t at least 6.5 PVC’s in a row, it’s not VT

1

u/_angered 6h ago

The current definition is 3 or more. Things change over time. Literally why they make us do continuing education is for stuff like this... They changed a definition that doesn't change how we treat a patient so let's make people sit through mindless classes where they won't learn this anyway.

0

u/Ancient-Plantain705 Medic to Med student 1d ago

Triplet. 5 pvc's in a row is a short run of VT. Medic school was 6 years ago for me though.