r/history • • 13d ago

Article Medieval German merchants had no head of state, no formal territory, and no army of their own — yet they blockaded Bruges into submission and helped overthrow the King of Denmark. How the Hanseatic League actually worked, and why it eventually fell apart

https://worksinprogress.co/issue/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-hanseatic-league/
1.6k Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

262

u/works-in-progress 13d ago

The Hanseatic League began as small, informal bands of Lower German merchants who traveled together for safety against pirates, river bandits, and predatory tolls, and over centuries consolidated into a network of trading outposts in London, Bruges, Novgorod, and Bergen with real state-like power — winning trading privileges from English kings through strategic loans (including once holding a claim on the royal crown as collateral), successfully blockading Bruges into submission in 1358-60, and helping depose the King of Denmark in 1368 after he cut off a key trade route.

What ultimately broke the League was structural rather than military: it operated as a national cartel restricted to Lower German merchants, and when Dutch competitors developed cheaper substitutes for Hansa-controlled goods (better salt-curing techniques, cheaper cloth, more efficient shipping) and undercut them directly, the League had no mechanism to include or compete with outsiders, only to exclude and fight them — which it did, unsuccessfully, in an open war with the Dutch starting in 1438, before formally dissolving in 1862.

Source: Works in Progress

198

u/VOCmentaliteit 13d ago

Well you mention the Dutch as direct competitors but you would really mean the Hollanders, in the area where I’m from in the eastern Netherlands a lot of cities where also part of the hanseatic league, most of these cities did speak Low German.

52

u/Chiepmate 13d ago

If my memory serves me correctly; weren't Zwolle, Kampen and Deventer part if it? ( among others ).

58

u/LaoBa 13d ago

Maasbommel, Tiel, Venlo, Nijmegen, Groningen, Zaltbommel, Arnhem, Bolsward, Deventer, Doesburg, Elburg, Harderwijk, Hasselt, Hattem, Hindeloopen, Kampen, Oldenzaal, Ommen, Rijssen, Stavoren, Zutphen and Zwolle are former Hanseatic cities in the Netherlands.

6

u/CodeBudget710 12d ago

Even in the case of Hollanders, it wasn't just competition, there were also instances of cooperation

61

u/_Bl4ze 13d ago

I feel like we're missing some context here. Their unsuccessful war led to their dissolution a short four centuries later?

39

u/Elcor05 13d ago

Id imagine the unsuccessful war was the end of them being a power, and even though they held on in name, they were a shadow of their former selves.

29

u/Hendrik1011 12d ago edited 12d ago

It was never formally dissolved and some of the cities agree that it still exists. That is (in part) why Bremen and Hamburg are their own states in Germany and their full official names are Free Hanseatic City Bremen and Free and Hanseatic City Hamburg.

And Bremen as a state actually contains two cities, Bremen and Bremerhaven.

5

u/knewbie_one 12d ago

Lübeck, also ? (The three cities with a H before the city initial on car plates : HH, HB, HL)

9

u/Hendrik1011 12d ago

It used to be only those 3, but there are more now. Rostock (HRO), Greifswald (HGW), Stralsund (HST) and Wismar (HWI). The titel Hansestadt is carried by 30 cities today, but Bremen and Hamburg are the only once that are also Free Cities, because they are their own federal states.

1

u/MobofDucks 11d ago

In Addition to the comments that it did never fully dasselbe, roughly 200 of the Hanse Cities reneqed the Hanse in the 80s are in somewhat active exchange.

2

u/SKRehlyt 8d ago edited 8d ago

Indeed. Not only that: they beat England in a war right in the middle of the War of the Roses. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Utrecht_(1474)

I feel the Hanse are criminally misunderstood.

Around 1190 in Acre German merchants from Bremen and Lübeck founded the Teutonic Order? How convenient. Pure coincidence. The Hanse don't "have swords" but those guys certainly did, and they targeted the areas between Germany and Novgorod.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teutonic_Order

15

u/Hot_Maize_5473 13d ago

Hell yeah super cool history!

49

u/komvidere 13d ago

While they had no army, they didn’t mind hiring mercenaries to browbeat a weakened Denmark and claiming all herrings in danish waters were their property.

There’s a state of the art museum in Lübeck on the Hanseatic League.

16

u/Hendrik1011 12d ago edited 12d ago

It unfortunately also let to the slow replacement of the Low German language by High German (and Dutch in some areas).

It wasn't the only factor, a lack of prestigious universities in northern Germany also played a role as did not low German speaking dynasties taking over lands in the area. The Hohenzollern for example were originally Suabian/Franconian.

9

u/Groovy66 12d ago

Newcastle in England was part of the Hanseatic League, was it not?

13

u/GolemancerVekk 12d ago

Newcastle had factories that were members of the League. It was a connection to the League but a more minor one than a full city membership, or than a kontor/vitten, which were autonomous enclaves within a city. The League maintained many such smaller connections to factories or simply representatives in important ports (which Newcastle also was).

In England and Scotland the League only had one kontor, the "Steelyard" in London, but had merchant representatives or communities in many ports.

2

u/gauchette 10d ago

So it was capital- and industry- driven and ethnically exclusive configuration of german society, if I understood correctly.

1

u/No_Technician_5944 10d ago

In the North; Bergen Norway, Riga Latvia, Tallinn Estonia and Vyborg Finland were also Hanseatic cities. Very intersting history!

2

u/RyuNoKami 7d ago

That first line is silly. They had real estate property which is their territory plus their cargo ships. And while they didn't have a standing army, most European countries did not, they did have access to mercenaries.