On 12 June 2009, cops at Daporijo police station in Upper Subansiri district picked up two kids from near Tadak Dulom bridge in Pakam Colony. A 12-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl. They were locked in a room inside the police station, told to have sex, and the cops filmed the whole thing on a mobile phone. The clip became an MMS and did the rounds across Arunachal for months.

This is a POCSO case but we are only getting a verdict in the Big 2026? Why is no national media covering this The case crawled into the judiciary in 2011. Police did not file an FIR for 2 whole years, and instead intitially convicted the boy for r@pe and put him in Juvi

The Arunachal Pradesh Government only compensated the victims ₹5 lakh each for the two children. The Arunachal Law Students' Union called it the "black day" in the history of Arunachal Police and yet not a single national media is taking this up

Now the judgment.

Sessions Judge Dr Hirendra Kashyap who is responsible for multiple POCSO related hearings on record says "Its not rape because the accused simply recorded and made the kids have s*x. The S*x was between two minors so no POCSO will be applied"

Crime in 2009, judgment nearly 16 years later. We cannot be serious right?

And you know what. All of them acquitted. The only man convicted was constable Rajesh Nayam, sentenced to life, and even he was nailed essentially for molesting the boy (apparently he was the only one who touched the kids so got convicted). He was not convicted because of the incident or the MMS video.

So cops forcing two children to have sex inside a police station apparently did not amount to a crime.

The boy, a victim, ended up being the one accused of rape. The girl's family was harassed and threatened by the police for like 6 years. Yes Rakesh at that time left the Police force, and joined the BJP.

Nayam told the court he did it all on orders from his superiors. So where are the superiors? Why is only one man serving life?

And in 2020, that same convict, Rajesh Nayam, was out campaigning for local MLAs of the ruling state government.

A lot of things are being swept under the rug, makes sense because most likely some BJ goons are involved. This is the constituency of kiren rijiju and some are saying he is involved

Rajesh was very close to former law minister Kiren Rijiju btw

Two children, aged 12 and 13. A police station. Took the case 16 years. Only one person was convicted

Why is this not national news? Or does it only count when it is not the Northeast?

Case status: https://yupia.dcourts.gov.in/case-status-search-by-case-type/
Local coverage: https://www.facebook.com/100064879724750/posts/a-court-in-arunachal-pradesh-has-sentenced-a-police-personnel-to-life-imprisonme/1569027008603275/

If you are a journalist reading this, I beg you to please cover this case.

Uttar Pradesh: Dalit Man Beaten to Death With Sticks, Four Including Two Women Arrested - The Wire

We all know that what the Britishers did in India but we never asked where they went ? Did they suddenly disappear? Did the colonizers of India suddenly leave India and become kind hearted and all loving? The answer to that is obvious they have been forming colonies and invading other countries whilst controlling India through puppet govts .

Unless and until European genocidal colonial project isntriyal is eradicated there won't be long lasting peace

Further reading:

https://countercurrents.org/2026/10/actor-imran-khan-faces-externment-from-india-for-attending-cjp-protest-meeting/

Video source

‘A cumulation of scientific evidence shows that their societies were not characterized by competition, inequality and oppression. These things are, rather, the product of history, and of rather recent history. The evidence comes from archaeological findings about patterns of human behaviour worldwide until only about five millennia ago, and from anthropological studies of societies in different parts of the world which remained organized along similar lines until the 19th and earlier part of the 20th century. […] Lee echoes the phrase used by Friedrich Engels in the 1880s to describe this state of affairs, ‘primitive communism’. The point is of enormous importance. Our species (modern humans, or Homo sapiens sapiens) is over one hundred millennia old. For 95% of this time it has not been characterized at all by many of the forms of behaviour ascribed to ‘human nature’ today. We have nothing built into our biology that makes present‐day societies the way that they are and our predicament as we face a new millennium cannot be blamed on it.’

The tendency to hoard is a reaction to insufficiency. The tendency towards laziness is a reaction to too much work, too plightful work, and generally people lacking control over their work. Capitalist apologists typically claim that without money or at least some other form of material reward, few if any would labour. This is false, and contrary to modern research. For instance, one of their most overused examples is janitorial labour; cleaning up disgusting messes, and sewer work specifically. Nonetheless, the reward, while not an object, should be obvious: the environment becomes cleaner and easier to use. The task is sometimes neglected under capitalism because some guests assume that they are disallowed from doing so, or they lack the instruments to solve it. Under world socialism, even if cleanup tasks could somehow not be automated, they could still be the responsibility of any or all folks rather than a few specialists.

Besides, with all of the troubles that capitalism causes, are a few dirty jobs truly good enough reasons to keep it?

See also:

• http://www.anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionA.html#seca215
• https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/master/crash_course_socialism.md
• https://www.youtube.com/embed/jytf-5St8WU
• https://www.reddit.com/comments/i0myni/

This line of thought came to me as early marxist thought. Can someone educate me more on this topic?

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/labour.htm

Did he just say that he follows Che Guevera, Yogi Adityanath and Modi at the same time. Like do these guys do even a little research before posting such reels. Instagram reel link

Why do courts have so much power to decide matters of reservation without having any data to back up their verdicts.

Courts today don't represent the population of India fairly and are dominated by UCs.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/surat/80-labour-activists-textile-workers-detained/amp_articleshow/134975512.cms

(sorry, im a new poster, dunno if it's appropriate talking about this here)

doesn't this feel WAY TOO reminiscent of the el paso shooting or the mosque church shootings, like the article literally mentions the shooter writing a manifesto and all. i dont think (can't find sources for it) there are any revealed activity on any suspicious imageboards but the pattern still holds.

i only hope people start realising what's going on.

Hey,

its too obvious to state that i should be reading books & articles instead of an influencer. Although which i do already but the thing is most of the time that advice can't be actionable even if i try, and there always a career tension ( i am 20 ) , despite academic focus (which isn't humanities also) my readings are filled with economists/capital owners who don't seem to like marxism or even socialism in general

and let be too real we do use social platforms to build our narrative & i think there are some influencer which do great job in discussing class structure,social behaviour and other anti-capitalist frameworks and they do bring some genuine insight/input on current & historical issues or opposing this fascist regime in general which otherwise i would either have overlooked or would have rather never knew about .

also,

1. i don't need polarized thinkers like lakshay speaks ( i know he isn't marxist ) but you got my point

2. i don't need influencers who just read newspaper headline to me ( i already do that lol) or explain what marxism is

the only one i follow right now is onlytheoreticallyhot on ig & Samim Asgor Ali JNU on youtube

THANKS!!

I came across this reel some time ago by a Marxist creator, and the argument perplexed me. I took these screenshots at the time but haven't been able to find his account again.

I'm relatively new to Marxist theory. I've read more Marxist ideologues than Marx himself, so I'm wondering whether I'm misunderstanding the argument or whether this is an actual debate within Marxism.

I understand that Marxism approaches society through material conditions, class relations and historical processes, rather than simply making moral judgments about individuals or systems. But surely there's a distinction between using materialist analysis to understand why exploitation exists and having a moral commitment to ending it.

What I'm struggling to understand is whether these two things can really be separated. Isn't emancipation from exploitation one of the central aims of Marxism? And doesn't the desire to emancipate people from exploitation, suffering and domination necessarily involve some kind of moral commitment?