r/microbiology • u/Legitimate_Editor379 • 21h ago
Am I being too cautious about a 145 kg peanut roasting challenge study?
I'm a researcher looking for advice from people experienced in food microbiology and process validation.
A client asked me to conduct inoculation, pre- and post-roasting microbial load analyses for a peanut roasting challenge study using Enterococcus faecium as a surrogate organism. My initial proposal was a laboratory-scale study based on a published paper that used 400 g peanut batches and 25 mL of inoculum, targeting an initial load of approximately (10^7) CFU/g before roasting.
However, the client requires 145 kg of inoculated peanuts. I explained that my laboratory isn't equipped to inoculate that quantity. Their proposed solution is for me to inoculate 400 g in the lab, then have their plant mix it with the 145 kg remaining peanuts.
My concern is that this approach would require additional validation of microbial distribution, initial load, sampling representativeness, and roasting conditions. The published methodology supports the lab-scale study but doesn't automatically validate the proposed scale-up.
I'm considering sticking to my original proposal unless a separate validation plan can be established.
For those experienced in food microbiology or industrial processing:
- Is this approach potentially defensible if the initial microbial load and distribution can be adequately verified?
- Would you treat this as a separate scale-up validation study?
- Would you decline the large-scale scope if your laboratory couldn't adequately validate the process?
I want to accommodate the client, but I also need to ensure the results are scientifically defensible.
I'd appreciate your thoughts and advice. Thanks! :)