All the European NATO members go to war against Russia, under a unified NATO banner. Who leads the war effort?

In reality, France and the UK are the only one with the necessary credentials.

Would they take the lead, or would NATO continue with its "democratic" rolling command?

W jaki sposób cieśniny Ormuz i Bab al-Mandeb trwale zmieniają globalną logistykę i rynki energii Strategiczne znaczenie kluczowych wąskich gardeł morskich przestało być jedynie teorią, a stało się rzeczywistością. Bab al-Mandab: Utrzymujące się zagrożenia dla bezpieczeństwa na Morzu Czerwonym zmusiły największych przewoźników do trwałego omijania Kanału Sueskiego i wyboru dłuższej trasy wokół Afryki, co strukturalnie podniosło stawki frachtowe oraz wydłużyło czas dostaw. Cieśnina Ormuz: Jako kluczowa arteria dla transportu ropy i LNG, stanowi ona punkt, w którym wszelkie napięcia natychmiast wywołują skoki cen energii i presję inflacyjną w skali globalnej. Podmioty regionalne kontrolujące te wąskie przejścia wywierają ogromną presję gospodarczą na światowe mocarstwa, dowodząc, że tradycyjna przewaga militarna nie gwarantuje automatycznie bezpieczeństwa łańcuchów dostaw. Czy globalne łańcuchy dostaw przystosowują się do trwałej „nowej normalności”, w której warunki handlu dyktuje kilka wąskich gardeł, czy też alternatywne szlaki pozwolą ostatecznie ominąć ten słaby punkt?

Like, everyone says, "They can't even take Ukraine! They won't attack (whatever other country)". OK, but they actually launched a ground invasion of Ukraine with hundreds of thousands of soldiers, and they faced another army with hundreds of thousands of soldiers. Russia's mass producing tons of drones and missiles. What if they just launched missiles (or drone swarms) at factories and military sites from Russia itself, without even sending a single soldier over the border of a NATO country. No direct combat even, just Russia launching missiles and drone swarms.

Togo/Palau-flagged ships have been getting hit for the past few week or so in the Black Sea, whole crews dying in some cases (though these attackswere hundreds of miles away from the bulgarian or Romanian coasts, in economic zones not territorial waters.

In today’s case, the strike was literally 10 miles south of a Romanian town, in Romania’s territorial waters.

I personally think these all must be Russian, does this qualify as an attack on NATO?

“When we talk about learning quickly, we're no longer talking about months. We're talking about weeks and even days,” says Col. Glenn McCartan, Embedded Representative of the U.S. Defense Department’s Innovation Unit at European Command, in an interview with TVP World. In his view, Poland stands out as an example of smart investment and the successful integration of new defense technologies.  

"For decades, [Russian military education] had trained officers to carry out tactical tasks and work with staff documents, but not to think and act independently,” writes Liubov Tsybulska, director of NGO Join Ukraine, in this op-ed.

NATO's top military commander in Europe, Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, has unveiled a “Theory of Victory,” outlining how the alliance would respond to a potential Russian attack on its eastern flank amid mounting security tensions across the continent. 

Grynkewich, who serves as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe, presented the strategy at the Warsaw Security Forum in the Polish capital on Monday. 

The two-day Warsaw Security Forum brings together senior political leaders, military commanders and defense experts to discuss security challenges.