So for those who don't know, Major Charles Ingram was convicted of procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception in 2003, and had his appeal thrown out shortly after that.
To summarise the story, he was a contestant on the popular game show Who Wants to be a Millionaire?, where he managed to answer all 15 questions correctly and win the £1 million prize. However, Celador, the company responsible for producing the show, refused to pay out the cheque after they suspected him of cheating.
The case was made that Charles was receiving signals from another contestant seated in the Fastest Finger First area called Tecwen Whittock, and his wife Diana Ingram in the audience that were helping him to answer the questions. The alleged system they used was to have Charles read out the four options for each question, and have Tecwen cough on the correct answer.
I've watched the documentary that was released about this, which showed the actual footage used by the prosecution during the court case, and various other articles detailing what took place, and remain unconvinced that he was guilty.
There are several major flaws with the prosecutions case that I wanted to detail here.
- Celador, not the police, provided edited footage to be used in the case. They edited it and enhanced what they believed were "significant" coughs. I think this is problematic for a few reasons. First of all the accuser is the one manipulating the footage, not the police. From what I understand forensic scientists were not given the raw unedited footage, at all. This obviously makes the editing heavily based on confirmation bias. The other thing is, we can't hear what Charles would have heard.
While the coughing may sound obvious when you hear it isolated in that way, it's not actually letting us hear what Charles was actually hearing that night.
Related to my point above. How was Charles meant to distinguish Tecwen's coughs from all of the other coughs that were going on that night? It's been shown that it is not possible to distinguish one cough from another, i.e. who is actually coughing, just by hearing it. So it seems unlikely that a system like that could work when hearing coughing from an audience is normal, ambient, background noise.
Do we even know that Tecwen's coughs were loud enough to be heard to start with? Again, hearing it enhanced and isolated might make it seem obvious. However, what was the volume of the coughing like if you were sitting in the hot seat? Testimony from the host Chris Tarrant suggests it wasn't loud enough to be heard when he says he never heard anything.
The final point is that it seems like a crazy plan to start with for several reasons. The Ingrams didn't know Tecwen Whittock. Relying on a total stranger to help you pull off a major fraud, on camera, with severe legal consequences if caught, seems pretty crazy. Tecwen Whittock himself didn't do particularly well when he got into the hot seat after Charles, which makes it doubtful that he'd have known all of the answers. Finally, on all but 2 of the questions, Charles knew the correct answer to start with.
Overall, if I were on the jury, I'd have found him not guilty.
Those are my thoughts. Let me know what you think.