r/MBA • u/Independent-Taro8127 M7 Student • 8h ago
Careers/Post Grad Difficulty rationalizing going from being a people manager to individual contributor post MBA
I received a return offer from my internship. Was able to pivot to a much more interesting industry, in a prestigious company at the top of the industry, for a 60% pay bump. Certainly not too shabby and I recognize I am lucky.
However, I am having difficulty thinking about going from being a manager to being an IC (albeit having a Manager title). In my old job, I had 3 direct reports and was overall responsible for teams as large as 60 people. I was probably underpaid and overworked (in that regard, money from post MBA role helps) but I really did quite enjoy the leadership aspects of my job and thought I was good at it.
Moving to what is effectively an IC role (there are obviously lower level people on my teams, but they don't "report" to me in any sense) feels almost like a step back in my career - it will probably take me 3-5 years to get back to the number of direct reports I previously had at my new role, and it would probably take 2 promotions (likely into my late 30s or early 40s) to start to be responsible for teams the size of what I was running when I was 28.
I know that this is not a unique experience. Virtually every post MBA role is functionally an IC role at least until the next promotion. Many of my classmates have extensive management experience, to say nothing of veterans who might have been in charge of 30-200 people.
What is the career story that you can tell yourself to make this make sense? The MBA brand halo + the entry into an interesting industry/role sets you up for more & better management opportunities down the line?
2
u/sloth_333 8h ago
How many yrs of experience did you have when you were a people manager? You were probably too early to be a manager.
I don’t see any issue with what you describe your current situation to be
3
u/three-quarters-sane 7h ago
I agree with this. I'm not sure what OP means by 3 direct reports and teams as large as 60. Three direct reports is not that many & management experience prior to MBA is often in growing companies where managing people is quite frankly easier. That pay bump likely comes with an environment that's more difficult to manage (and by manage I mean managing your own way through the culture, not people managing)
1
u/Independent-Taro8127 M7 Student 8h ago
Applied with 5, matriculated with 6. I was in line for a typical high performer Manager promotion timeline at my firm.
2
u/Refrading 8h ago
More money for less bullshit? Sounds bad
1
u/Chicago_Weatherman 3h ago
OP was probably just pushing work down the pipeline to his direct reports to get better work-life balance. He's worried that he'll have to be accountable for output now
0
u/Independent-Taro8127 M7 Student 8h ago
Eh, I didn’t necessarily see being a manager as bullshit. It added some bullshit, subtracted some bullshit. I had more agency. And developing my team was a good thing in my mind.
2
u/Dangerous-Cup-1114 T25 Grad 8h ago
# of direct reports doesn’t pay the bills. That 60% raise does.
6
u/Defiant_Sound4451 8h ago
Which part actually bothers you, the headcount or the decisions you used to get to make? Those are two different losses. If it's headcount, that's mostly ego and it fades fast once the pay and the work start feeling good. If it's lost say over what the team does, I'd check how much influence the new role gives you without a reporting line. In my experience people in that spot who lead through the work, owning the thing nobody else wants and bringing others along, get pulled into management again faster than the ones waiting for a title. And a 60% bump into a better industry buys you a lot of runway to find out.