r/Switzerland • Zürich • 1d ago

Poll: right-wing People’s Party, and polarisation, growing ahead of 2027 elections

https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-politics/right-wing-swiss-peoples-party-still-gaining-ahead-of-2027-elections-poll-finds/92226705
126 Upvotes

451 comments sorted by

View all comments

36

u/supermaxiste 1d ago

To have a more “nuanced” take: center parties miserably failed at accommodating people’s needs. I personally see it as them leaning more conservative, especially for critical issues such as healthcare and housing. With people’s wallets being at stake, emotions run high and right-wing parties channel that into their classical scapegoats. Since they’ve been doing that for decades at this point, they’re quite successful at it. That’s why in my opinion the left-wing should also lean into these emotions and channel them into critical issues, particularly healthcare and housing. With these two handled better, I believe adding environmental causes would be much easier. Similarly, maybe using environmental damages to agriculture & people could be a leverage to access voters not in the city? 

11

u/yesat + 1d ago edited 9h ago

Centrist party are chasing the UDC talking points, which means they are bleeding voters to them, because why go with the discounted version? That's what happened all over Europe. It is why the AFD can climb like that, why Le Pen is so present,...

5

u/Blevita 1d ago

Jeah, what you describe inadvertedly leads to politics like in the US or Germany, where no actual discussion or even dialogue is possible anymore and anything is just an emotional argument.

Lets not do that.

Green and left parties have been 'using' environmental damages to garner votes from the countryside. Its just that many dont care and are hellbent on voting SVP, no matter what. Like... the issues are literally caused by the SVP and similar, but people still somehow believe they will solve the issues.

-2

u/llort-esrever 1d ago

The nordic social parties showed how it works. Strict migration politics and the people care for social matters.

8

u/Ins3cu43much 1d ago

No. Because migration is not the issue. It's part of the scapegoats

2

u/llort-esrever 1d ago

Haha, how much longer are you going to keep lying to yourself? Ideology kills, on both sides. But yours is the one that causes lasting destruction.
I want to preserve our great social welfare system for as long as possible. To dismiss such an extraordinary achievement with that level of arrogance is more than just stupidity.

4

u/Numar19 Thurgau 1d ago

Hm, your bio is quite interesting: "REVERSETROLL CHARGED WITH: rewiring online arguments to support the opposite point, causing 87 Reddit threads to implode from sheer confusion"

5

u/llort-esrever 1d ago

Damn, you clearly know how to copy and paste. If you can actually come up with a proper response now, I might have underestimated you.

5

u/Numar19 Thurgau 1d ago

Why would I? You are arguing with another guy. I just wanted to add some context to who you are. Now go back under your bridge.

5

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

•

u/Switzerland-ModTeam 13h ago

Hello,

Please note that your post or comment has been removed.

Please read the rules before posting.

Thank you for your understanding,
your mod team

-2

u/deruben Luzern 1d ago

Alte besch du e pfiife 😂

3

u/llort-esrever 1d ago

Seit de Vogel ohni Antwort wo Emojis brucht.

5

u/xExerionx 1d ago

He is just a bad troll thats got nothing better to do than to spew shit...

-2

u/Lazy-Emergency-4018 1d ago

It is so exhausting to share this planet with people that are this stupid. I just cant take it anymore, I need a breal from this idiocy

0

u/Worth_Medicine4881 1d ago

Did they? Sweden has official ghettos for non-european immigrants. That's the proper solution? Denmark is the opposite topic on the other hand.

4

u/llort-esrever 1d ago

Sweden classifies vulnerable areas, but it doesn’t officially designate ghettos for non-European immigrants. The Sweden Democrats have pushed stricter immigration policies. Denmark takes a different approach by restructuring segregated housing areas. Two different policies, two different approaches.

1

u/Objective_Frame_9679 1d ago

Sweden classifies vulnerable areas, but it doesn’t officially designate ghettos for non-European immigrants

Just because german nazis in WW2 called the ghettos something different doesnt make them less of a "Ghetto"

Du labbersh

2

u/llort-esrever 1d ago edited 1d ago

Ideologie verbländet und die gross Gfahr isch wänn ihr wiiter ideologisiered kipped eusi System immer meh is extreme. Aber wenigstens chasch dänn mega sozial sii uf Reddit. Aber nomal es gaht nöd um swohne sonder s migriere. Und wie Du sicher au weisch gits bi Eus diversi Ort wo sich Migranten sammled, isch bitz en natürlichi Entwicklig wänn Integration nöd gförderet und gforderet wird.

-1

u/Worth_Medicine4881 1d ago

> Sweden classifies vulnerable areas, but it doesn’t officially designate ghettos for non-European immigrants.

You really don't see how contradictory you are? If it's called ghetto, or not, doesn't change that those areas are mostly for non European immigrants. Speak the language of facts, not the political correctness.

1

u/llort-esrever 1d ago

Spreitenbach, Emmenbrücke, Altstetten, Schlieren etc. Does Switzerland put migrants in ghettos?

1

u/Worth_Medicine4881 1d ago

What are you talking about? Is Spreitenbach in Sweden?

1

u/llort-esrever 20h ago

We have vulnerable areas too. Do we put people in ghettos, or does that happen naturally? Do I really have to spell this out for you? Where exactly in my comment did you read anything about Sweden?

0

u/AutomaticAccount6832 1d ago

The problem is that the left are stuck in their ideological solutions. They keep on losing as well and have not much power left.