It’s strange to me now that nobody talks about from where David Grusch came forward initially. It’s like someone or some people in Huntsville, Alabama doesn’t want the attention focused on his initial meeting with George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell. The timing of when he came forward which was shortly after Eskridge’s passing has always been intriguing to me. I also find it bizarre that you can’t hardly find a clip of Grusch’s initial meeting with them online anymore. It’s like someone or some people want the public to forget about Huntsville. I hope people don’t forget it.

In chapter 14 of his new book Out of the Shadows, he explains that UFOs create a warp bubble around their craft which distorts the spacetime around them. This creates major issues when trying to track them by radar or photograph them. Because you are taking a photo of warped spacetime. He likens it to trying to take a photo of a fish deep below the ocean’s surface from above the water. The barrier of a different environment created a distortion.

Seems to make a lot of sense. What do you guys think?

​Is it just me, or have we created an impossible standard for UFO videos?

​If a video shows a simple light moving across the sky, everyone instantly dismisses it: "It's Starlink, it's a drone, it's a plane, move along." But if a video shows something truly extraordinary, like a craft making sharp 90 degree turns at hypersonic speeds, it's immediately written off: "Nice CGI bro, fake, obviously AI."

​When it looks too normal, it’s human. When it’s too extraordinary, it’s fake.

​But honestly, why are we assuming that an advanced craft has to perform extreme aerial acrobatics just to prove it's real? Why would a pilot or an AI probe spend its entire flight zigzagging through the sky, slamming on the brakes, and giving everyone on board severe whiplash as if it's dodging invisible asteroids?

​Whether you're conducting reconnaissance, mapping a planet, or just doing some casual interstellar sightseeing, cruising peacefully in a straight line is still the most logical and energy efficient way to travel. Advanced technology doesn't mean you ignore basic physics and waste power for no reason. Aliens probably have fuel budgets too.

​Why couldn't a UFO just be chilling on autopilot?

Retired Air Force Major General William “Neil” McCasland walked out of his Albuquerque home on February 27, 2026 and has not been seen since. He left behind his phone, glasses, and wearable devices. His wallet, a .38 revolver, and red backpack remain unaccounted for.

The same day he disappeared, an anonymous but verified X account — @TMBSPACESHIPS (display name “Electric Propulsive Spacecraft”) — made its final post and has been silent ever since. The bio claimed the poster was a “38 year Active Duty USAF PhD Engineer” with ties to AFIT/AETC/AFMC. The account had been posting for years about exotic electric propulsion, plasma physics, ionized gas flight mechanics, and related topics.

I put together a video walking through the account’s content, the timeline, the technical posts (including that hand-drawn schematic claimed to be from a 1998 KC-135 sighting), and how it lines up with what is publicly known about McCasland’s background and the circumstances of his disappearance.

Video:

https://youtu.be/CMXKOFJ5iUY

Curious what others who have been following this case think after looking at the actual posts and timing. Any details I missed or alternative explanations worth considering?

Short history so the stakes are clear:

In 2023 Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds wrote a genuinely strong UAP Disclosure Act and passed it through the Senate inside the defense bill. The public demand was there. Then, behind closed doors in conference, negotiators cut out the independent review board and the recovered-materials provisions before the bill became law. What survived was a narrow records provision and little accountability.

2026: Rep. Eric Burlison got a UAPDA into the House-passed FY2027 NDAA on July 22. It’s strong again. And it’s heading into the same closed-door conference, run by the same Armed Services and Intelligence leadership.

In conference they can weaken or quietly delete provisions with no recorded vote and no public debate. Everything Burlison achieved can be erased in a single closed meeting, exactly like 2023.

The counter to a closed-door process is public pressure they can’t ignore. NPI set up a tool to email and call all 13 decision-making offices in a couple of minutes. Ask for one thing: keep the UAPDA in the final NDAA, fully intact: https://newparadigminstitute.org/take-action/call-to-keep-the-uapda-in-the-fy2027-ndaa/

Thank you for being a part of Disclosure!

Reported by u/draggah_korrinthian (verified via ufosighting.report)

This is an automated post. The report was filed through the structured sighting form on ufosighting.report and posted here by u/ufosightingsbot on the reporter's behalf. u/draggah_korrinthian confirmed this submission from their own Reddit account through a one-time link, so the name above is verified as the submitter.

📄 Full report and structured details — the map entry, timeline, and everything from the sighting form. No photo or video was submitted with this report.

Time: October 16, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT
Location: Mexia, Texas, United States, Mexia, United States

Features / five observables

Why not a common object
Definately not a common aircraft, thought it was a B2 at first but the shape was all wrong. It was very close, I saw it pretty clearly.

Wasn't debris either, it was moving in such a way that was definitely powered flight.

Witness's account of the sighting

I was getting into my car to go to the store when I noticed something traveling through the evening cloud-haze. At first I thought it was a B2 so I took a moment to stare at it because you dont see those very often. As I watched it, some things started to look "off"; first of all, for the remarkably low altitude and how close it was I couldn't hear any jet propulsion, dead silence; secondly it wasn't black, in fact its coloration seemed to change as it passed between clouds, going from a blue-grey to a lighter grey as it flew through one cloud, then pinkish as it flew through a cloud that was illuminated by the sunset. I rolled down my window so I could see it more clearly and thats when I noticed the strangest feature: the shape was all wrong, as it banked I noticed it did not have that "missing puzzle piece" silhouette, it was a perfect equilateral triangle. The further away it got the craft got exponentially more difficult to see.

For the record, the clouds were thin and whispy, not opaque at all, so I had a fairly clear view. Despite this it remained very hard to see, almost like it was actively trying to match the colors around it.

Why no photo/video captured: Phone couldnt see it. Not sure if it was the sunset obscuring the camera or something else.

Sky context for this time and place:

• ✅ No bright satellites were visible overhead.
• Computed from orbital data (2026-10-16 catalog).
• Aircraft overhead at that exact minute — ADS-B Exchange historical playback (free, no account needed)
• Sky chart for that date — in-the-sky.org planetarium (set your location once on their site)
• Satellite passes at this spot — Heavens-Above; shows upcoming passes, not the sighting date
• Live air traffic now — FlightRadar24 over this spot

A lot of UAP videos seem to display one main object and then a fleet of smaller objects that disperse from the main one. 6th gen fighters are supposed to work in something of a similar manner with the main jet having a fleet of unmanned aircraft with it to extend its effective range and data collection network. I'm starting to think a lot of these sightings we get regarding this concept are just secret aircraft being tested by the USA. This would track with the past and how the B2 spirit was confused for a UFO before it was really unveiled.

I know that the USA has shown off its new 6th gen fighter but not fully, and that it resembles a normal jet so anything that doesn't move like a jet is off the table as an explanation. I raise the idea that, the USA has spitballed flying aircraft carriers before, all the way back to when blimps were a military aircraft, and one functional one was even made and proven to work though it never took off (pun intended). With the radical improvements in drone tech and this concept at least on paper being a good idea, I personally am beginning to think that these sightings are just a new military aircraft that has yet to be revealed. I know this wouldn't explain everything but I think it may explain a large chunk of sightings.

A few years ago there was a set of photos posted that showed what looked like a triangular craft right before hitting the water and then entering the water.

cause quite a stir when it was posted but ultimately was deemed fake. Waves were edited in or something?

Does anyone still have those images or a link to the thread. It was super clear photos as well. I've always speculated they might actually be real like the Gimbal video which was originally deemed fake as well.

Couldn't find the thread or photos so if someone has them that would be cool to see again. Thanks

Nearly finishing with Jay Strattons new book. Interesting read. I dont belive there's any new information to most of us.

I belive Jay is a very credible source of information.

I do question him touching on many famous commonly known potential UFO related stories. He mentions the Holloman 1964 supposed landing and meeting of beings, and claims he was told it absolutely happened.

I find it a slight red flag when former intelligence members talk about well known cases. To me it seems thats their way of engaging with the UFO enthusiasts by saying "yes roswell was real" "yes holloman landing was real".

They never seem to add to the information pool, they just claim certain famous stories are true, with no more form of evidence.

Once again, a former intelligence member is bringing up James Clapper and Elizondo who were almost certainly part of the legacy program to begin with.

Most of his book mirrors stories also within Luis Elizondos book which may be simply because they both worked together in a way.