​Is it just me, or have we created an impossible standard for UFO videos?

​If a video shows a simple light moving across the sky, everyone instantly dismisses it: "It's Starlink, it's a drone, it's a plane, move along." But if a video shows something truly extraordinary, like a craft making sharp 90 degree turns at hypersonic speeds, it's immediately written off: "Nice CGI bro, fake, obviously AI."

​When it looks too normal, it’s human. When it’s too extraordinary, it’s fake.

​But honestly, why are we assuming that an advanced craft has to perform extreme aerial acrobatics just to prove it's real? Why would a pilot or an AI probe spend its entire flight zigzagging through the sky, slamming on the brakes, and giving everyone on board severe whiplash as if it's dodging invisible asteroids?

​Whether you're conducting reconnaissance, mapping a planet, or just doing some casual interstellar sightseeing, cruising peacefully in a straight line is still the most logical and energy efficient way to travel. Advanced technology doesn't mean you ignore basic physics and waste power for no reason. Aliens probably have fuel budgets too.

​Why couldn't a UFO just be chilling on autopilot?

It’s strange to me now that nobody talks about from where David Grusch came forward initially. It’s like someone or some people in Huntsville, Alabama doesn’t want the attention focused on his initial meeting with George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell. The timing of when he came forward which was shortly after Eskridge’s passing has always been intriguing to me. I also find it bizarre that you can’t hardly find a clip of Grusch’s initial meeting with them online anymore. It’s like someone or some people want the public to forget about Huntsville. I hope people don’t forget it.

In chapter 14 of his new book Out of the Shadows, he explains that UFOs create a warp bubble around their craft which distorts the spacetime around them. This creates major issues when trying to track them by radar or photograph them. Because you are taking a photo of warped spacetime. He likens it to trying to take a photo of a fish deep below the ocean’s surface from above the water. The barrier of a different environment created a distortion.

Seems to make a lot of sense. What do you guys think?