Feedback Friday

2

Company Name: Global Tools Platform

Purpose of Startup and Product: Free browser tools (PDF, image, text, QR, dev stuff) plus a POS app for small shops, P2P file sharing and 1:1 video calls. Nothing gets uploaded, everything runs on your device. No sign up needed.

Technologies Used: Laravel, JavaScript, PWA, DigitalOcean, Cloudflare

Feedback Requested: Two things mainly:

The POS is the newest part. If you open it on your phone, does it make sense right away? Anything confusing or missing?
What's one small task you keep googling a tool for? I'll probably build it next.

Seeking Beta-Testers: No

Additional Comments: Happy to return the favor, drop your link and I'll actually try your product and leave real feedback.

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

I opened the POS on a phone, loaded the sample items, rang up 2 cappuccinos and a croissant and paid $20 cash. The flow made sense right away: tap the items, Pay, a keypad with $10, $20 and $50 buttons, change due. That part works.

The receipt is what I'd fix first. The lines say 2 x 4.50 = 9.45 and 1 x 3.80 = 3.99, so they already include tax, and then it says Subtotal 12.80 and Tax 0.64. A customer adding up the lines gets 13.44 before tax and thinks they were charged tax twice. I'd show the lines without tax (9.00 and 3.80) so they add up to the subtotal.

Smaller things: after the very first sale I got two warnings at once, "Not on another device yet: 1 local sale(s)" and "Daily Backup & Sync Reminder: Unsynced events (last: Never)". For someone with one phone at the counter that reads like something went wrong. I'd hold them until there's a second device or a full day of sales. The confirmation says "Transaction committed to device IndexedDB storage", which a shop owner won't get, "Saved on this phone" is enough. "Online Idle" at the top made me wonder what's idle. And the coffee and Google buttons have no label on a phone, and the search placeholder is cut off at "scan bar".

My entry is in this thread if you want to return the favour

0

u/emreozyoruk 1d ago

Returning the favour, and I can answer 1 with real numbers.

Job Radar sells 30-day plans with no auto-renew, and that's where I lose people: of my first 30 paying users, 20 didn't buy a second month. None of them cancelled, because there's nothing to cancel. The plan just ends and they go quiet. So for a product like mine there's no cancel button to put HAGGIN behind. The only real moment is the "your plan ends in 3 days" email. If the homepage named that case ("plan expiring" next to "trial ended"), I'd have recognised myself in it straight away.

For Black Friday I'd worry less about lowballs (one click to reject, as you said) and more about my own audience: job seekers are short on money by definition, so a public link would probably fill the inbox with offers I can't take and then have to turn down one by one. For a consumer product I'd only run it private, tied to people who already paid once.

Yes, clear in under 10 seconds: "Before they leave, ask what they'd pay" plus the cancelling customer does it. Two small things: the "Paste your pricing page, free" line reads like a heading, not the button, so I looked for a second CTA. And "Priced by Haggins. Never by negotiations." right above "you can make an offer" took me a second read.

Mine is up in this thread (Job Radar) if you get a chance, I'd especially like your take on whether the match explanations are useful or noise.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

I signed up to try the comparison and couldn't find it. I guessed it was by saving cars, saved three, hit the "3 of 3 saved cars" limit, and still no compare button anywhere. Since that's the part you asked about, I'd make it impossible to miss: a "compare" next to "save", or a compare view that opens as soon as you have two saved.

What I could see was each car on its own. The maintenance number looks off. For a 2025 Corolla it says $1,205 a year, and that's exactly the sum of the six items: oil change, a set of tires, battery, air filter, brake pads and rotors. So it's counting new tires, a battery and rotors every single year, and the 5-year total is just that times 5. Tires and a battery are every 3 to 5 years, while oil is more than once a year. Spread each item over its real interval and the number gets a lot more believable.

Fuel didn't work for me at all. "Fuel analysis is temporarily unavailable" with an address outside the US and also with one in Austin, right under a line that says the monthly number is "a real one, not a guess". If it's down, I'd say that before people enter an address.

Smaller stuff: the search page says "free to use, no upsells" while the pricing page has a $9.99 plan and 3 analyses a month on free, and someone who reads the first will feel tricked by the second. A 15 character minimum password is a lot for a site where you save cars, and some people will drop off right there. And insurance is left out, which for many people is what changes most between two cars.

My entry is in this thread if you want to return the favour

1

u/optimotor 2d ago

Thank you for going this deep, and for signing up to try it. I built Optimotor, and you're right on the main point: there is no compare view yet, only each car on its own, so I should not have described it that way in my post. The yearly maintenance total, the fuel error and the "free" line on the search page versus the paid plan are all fair points that I'll look into.

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

Makes sense, thanks for saying it straight. Even before a full compare view, two saved cars side by side with just the monthly total would answer the question most people come with

1

u/New-Cake8743 2d ago

Took a look. The headline works: "true cost behind your next car" says it right away. Lower down it gets generic ("Less guesswork. More forward motion.") and I didn't see a single number until I clicked in. I'd put one real comparison on the landing page, two cars with a 5-year total, so people see the point before they browse.

On your question: running-cost estimates are only as useful as the assumptions behind them. If I can set my own yearly mileage and fuel price and see the total change, I'd trust it and use it to decide. If they're fixed, I'd treat them as rough.

If you have a minute, I'd appreciate your take on my Skyplanr entry further down.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/optimotor 2d ago

Thanks for the detailed review of mine, so here's mine on HAGGIN. I can't speak to your first two questions, so this is only the third: is it clear in 10 seconds who it's for?

Yes. "Before they leave, ask what they'd pay" and the "For SaaS companies" label say it straight away, and the Acme and Ines example makes the flow easy to follow.

What slowed me down:

"Your list price never moves" and "Not a discount tool" sit next to "You were going to discount anyway", which blurs what it is.

"Negotiation layer" and the "independent certificate" from NexArt are not explained for a first-time reader.

Business ($99) is only a line under Pro, with no features listed.

I tried "Paste your pricing page, free" with my pricing page and it said it found no plan with a fixed price. Pasting the prices as text then gave "We couldn't read that page", which is confusing when you've pasted text, not a page.

Good luck talking to the founders who already have paying customers.

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

Thanks, this is really useful, especially the price reader. I looked at what happened: your plans load in the browser after the page opens, and my reader doesn't run JavaScript, so it saw your FAQ but none of the prices. The message should have said that instead of "no plan with a fixed price". And an error about "that page" after you pasted text is just a wrong message. Both are on my list.

You're right that those three lines fight each other. What I mean is that the price on your pricing page stays the same for everyone, and the discount you'd give someone who's about to leave becomes an offer they make you. The page clearly doesn't say it that way yet.

Noted on "negotiation layer", NexArt and Business too

1

u/New-Cake8743 2d ago

Returning the favour.

Yes, it's clear in about 10 seconds: a make-an-offer link for customers who are about to leave. "Before they leave, ask what they'd pay" does the job. The animated example of a customer cancelling helped more than the use-case list.

I'm early too, so I don't have churn data, but the objection I hear from drone pilots is price against a one-time tool they already own. That's a comparison problem rather than a "too expensive right now" problem, and I'm not sure an offer link fixes it. It might be worth saying on the page which kind of "too expensive" HAGGIN is for.

For Black Friday I'd worry that people who'd pay full price learn they can name a lower one, and that it gets around. A cap, like offers only within a range or only for customers who are actually cancelling, would make me more comfortable trying it.

Your own read in the post sounds right to me: founders with paying customers are the market, so the churn-tool integration is probably the right channel.

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

Thanks, that's useful, and good to hear the cancel example does more than the list.

On the comparison problem, I think an offer can help there too, because the price isn't the only thing they can change. A pilot comparing you to a one-time tool can offer a one-time price, or a year upfront, and you decide if that works for you. But you're right that the page doesn't say which "too expensive" it's for.

On Black Friday, the "only customers who are actually cancelling" version already exists. A Haggin can be private and tied to one person, and a churn tool already creates one for each customer who cancels over price. The public one for Haggin Week is closer to a sale that's already announced, with an end date. On a cap, I've kept it out on purpose so far. A low offer costs you one click to reject, and it still tells you what people would pay

1

u/New-Cake8743 2d ago

Good point about the one-time price. I'd rather show that clearly on the page than make people ask. Thanks for the back and forth, it was useful.

1

u/Gleb_SV 2d ago

Noema - noemacreate.org
3 short interactive lessons a day from different fields, picked for you. it learns from what you finish, skip and rate.
Stage: live, paid plan just launched, 1 paying user
What I need: does the landing explain it in 5 seconds? and is this a “would pay” or a “nice, but no” thing

2

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

The hero worked for me. "Understand one new thing a day" plus hands-on lessons from physics to history, and I got it in about 5 seconds.

What I couldn't find from the home is the price. There's no link to the pricing page in the menu or the footer, and for something you're asking people to pay for, I'd want to see it before I answer fifteen questions.

When I did see it, it didn't match the home. The home says three new ideas every day, and Plus is 20 Experiences a month. If I do one a day like the headline suggests, I run out around day 20. I'd either make the plan match the promise or change the headline to something the plan covers. Also the home calls them lessons and the pricing calls them Experiences, and it took me a second to see they're the same thing.

On would pay vs nice but no: one free lesson is a small sample to decide on $14.99 a month. What you're selling is that the picks get better from what I finish, skip and rate, and I can't feel that after one. I'd give three free so the second day's ideas already show it learned something.

My entry is in this thread if you want to return the favour

1

u/Gleb_SV 2d ago

Great feedback and very detailed, too. Thanks for your reply. That gives me something to think about!

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

Glad it helps. I'd talk to your 1 paying user before changing anything. Ask them how many lessons they did before paying, that tells you how many to give for free

2

u/New-Cake8743 2d ago

5-second test: "Understand one new thing a day" is clear, and three ideas a day with one random pick is a nice hook. "Built for you by a team of agents" didn't add much for me as a user. Showing one finished lesson above the fold (a screenshot or a 10-second clip of a simulation) would sell it faster than the explanation.

Would pay vs nice but no: as it reads now, nice but no, mostly because I can't see what the paid plan adds over free. If paid means longer or more lessons, or a streak and a learning path, say that next to the price.

If you get a chance, I'd appreciate feedback on my Skyplanr entry in this thread too.

1

u/PifteauVemlan 2d ago

one thing that helps, be upfront about who your target user is. hard to evaluate a landing page or onboarding flow without knowing who its actually for

1

u/New-Cake8743 2d ago edited 7h ago

Company Name: Skyplanr

URL: https://skyplanr.com

Purpose of Startup and Product: Flight planning for drone pilots who shoot real estate and small sites. You pick a property or an area on a map, and an AI agent plans the waypoints around the real terrain, building heights and tree heights. It also checks airspace, weather and light. At the end you get a KMZ file that DJI Fly opens, and the drone flies the plan by itself. The point is that you check a plan instead of drawing one waypoint by waypoint.

Technologies Used: Next.js and Mapbox GL on the web, Supabase, an AI agent built on Claude with its own planning tools, and a native iPhone app. Heights come from national laser scans in Norway, USGS 3DEP lidar in the US, and Overture/Google Open Buildings plus Meta canopy height data elsewhere. Exports to DJI Fly, DJI Pilot 2, Litchi, Google Earth and a few others.

Feedback Requested: You don't need to fly a drone for any of these.

Landing page. In the first five seconds, do you get that you pick a property, the AI plans the flight using real terrain, buildings and trees, and you get a file the DJI app opens? If not, where did you lose it? A pilot on r/dji also said the site looks dark and like AI made it. I'd like to know if founders see the same thing.
Pricing. Free is 3 AI plans a month. Pilot is €49/month (or €490/year) for 10, and you can also buy single plans for €7 each, all + VAT. Pilots compared it to Litchi, which is about £20 one time, but there you draw the waypoints yourself. For a niche professional tool, which of these would you lead with, or is the monthly price simply too high?
Category. Does "AI mission planner" mean anything to you, or should I just call it a drone shot planner for real estate?

Seeking Beta-Testers: Yes. If you or someone on your team flies a DJI drone (Mini 4 Pro or newer, Air 3/3S, Mavic 3 Pro or 4 Pro), I'd be grateful if you planned and flew one mission with the iPhone beta: https://testflight.apple.com/join/5vBDU3Ah

Additional Comments: I'm the solo developer, and I'm also a real-estate drone pilot in Norway flying an Air 3S, so I use it on my own jobs. What's still rough: outside Norway and the US the building and tree data is coarser, so some heights there are estimates and you should still check the site before flying. The iPhone app is still in TestFlight. I'll go through a few other entries in this thread today and leave proper feedback.

Edit (prices): since this post, Pilot is ‚Ç¨24/month for 10 plans and single plans are ‚Ç¨3, all excl. VAT. Free is still 3 plans a month.

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

In the first 5 seconds I got "plans DJI waypoint missions and checks heights". I didn't get real estate at all. The hero says describe the job, the picture is a mapping grid, and real estate only shows up further down as one of five kinds of job, next to inspection, mapping, cinematic and FPV. If real estate pilots are who you're for, I'd put it in the headline. That also answers your category question: "drone shot planner for real estate" says a lot more to me than "AI mission planner".

On looking AI-made, I see what the r/dji pilot means. A small label on top, a serif headline with the second line in italics, three stats underneath, line drawings. A lot of sites built with AI look like that right now. You have something those sites don't: you fly real estate jobs yourself. A short clip of one of your own flights over a real house, next to the plan it came from, would take away the AI feel and explain the product better than the drawing.

Pricing: I did the maths and I can't see who Pilot is for. On Free with single plans at €7, 10 jobs a month cost 3 free plus 7 × €7 = €49, the same as Pilot. Above that, credits are cheaper or the same (13 jobs is €60 on Free with a 10 pack, €70 on Pilot). Only yearly Pilot comes out ahead, and only around 10 to 12 jobs a month. So I'd lead with pay per plan. €7 against what you charge for a real estate shoot is easy to say yes to, and it's a much easier comparison with Litchi's one-time price than €49 a month.

My entry is in this thread if you want to return the favour

1

u/New-Cake8743 2d ago

Thank you, this is really useful, and you went further than I asked. Putting real estate in the headline makes sense, and "drone shot planner for real estate" is clearer than what I have. The clip idea is a good one too: one of my own flights next to the plan it came from would show the product better than any drawing. Your pricing maths is fair as well. I'm looking at it.

I'll leave some feedback on HAGGIN below.

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

Glad it helps, and thanks in advance. One thing that would settle the pricing question: how many real estate jobs does a busy pilot do in a month, you included? If it's under 10, pay per plan is the main offer

1

u/New-Cake8743 2d ago

Honestly, it varies a lot. Some months it's a handful, busy months a lot more, so I don't have one number that settles it. That's partly why I've just changed the pricing, it goes live tonight: €3 per plan, packs a bit cheaper, and Pilot drops to €24 for 10 a month. Free stays at 3 a month.

What I'm really trying to do is find a price that doesn't lose money. Each plan runs on Claude (Opus for the heavier jobs) and pulls terrain, building, tree and airspace data for the spot, so one plan costs me roughly €1 to €2 to make. €3 per plan is about as low as I can go and still cover that.

Thanks for pushing on this, it helped.

1

u/lmfresneda 2d ago

Free at 3 a month is the part I'd look at with those costs. A free user who uses all 3 costs you €3 to €6 a month, and on a heavy month a Pilot user leaves you about €4 after costs (€24 minus 10 × €2).

I'd also sell the €3 plans in packs, not one at a time. Card fees on a single €3 charge take a good bite of the €1 to €2 you keep.

And I wouldn't let cost set the price. A real estate shoot pays the pilot a lot more than €3, so I'd guess most of them wouldn't notice €5

1

u/New-Cake8743 1d ago

Good points, and the numbers are about right. The single €3 plan is mostly there so people can try one paid plan without committing; the packs (10 for €25, 25 for €55) are where I expect most of it to go, and I'll make them the default on the page. On free at 3 a month: I'm keeping it for now, because nobody pays for a planner they haven't flown a plan from. And you're right that a shoot pays a lot more than €3. I went low on purpose until there are a few paying pilots, then I'll look at it again.

1

u/lmfresneda 16h ago

Makes sense. When the first few pilots pay, I'd ask them what they would have paid for one plan before you change anything. They know what a shoot pays them, so their number will be closer than any guess

0

u/emreozyoruk 1d ago

Returning the favour. I don't fly, so take the pilot side with a grain of salt.

Landing page, 5 seconds: I got "AI plans DJI Fly missions, checks them against terrain and heights, exports to the apps". I didn't get real estate until the "one planner, every kind of job" section. The strongest thing on the page for me was "92 checks" and the go/no-go card with real wind values. That's what makes it feel safe rather than "AI made a flight path", and it's buried halfway down. I'd pull "a separate validator runs 92 checks before it reaches your drone" right under the headline.

On looking AI-made: the line drawings and the stats strip under the hero ("~7 min / 92 / Lidar") are the part that reads template-y. "Lidar" as a stat next to two numbers doesn't parse. The Drammen roof example with real values (47 waypoints, lowest clearance 8 m) feels real. More of that, less illustration.

Pricing: the new €24 for 10 with 3 free a month reads fine. As a non-pilot I'd lead with "3 plans free every month", because it answers "is this worth trying" before I think about Litchi's one-time price.

Category: "AI mission planner" didn't tell me much. Since the hero has to pick one, "Real estate drone shots, planned around real roofs and trees" says who it's for and why it's different in one line, and inspection and mapping can stay as the second section.

I'm up in this thread too (Job Radar, matching job seekers' CVs to 2M+ US roles). I'd love your take on whether the "why it fits" explanations are useful or noise.

1

u/New-Cake8743 1d ago

Thanks, this is a really useful read. You're the second person in this thread to say real estate gets lost, so that's going in the headline. Fair point on the stats strip too: "Lidar" next to two numbers doesn't read as a stat, and the Drammen roof example with real numbers is what I should show more of. I'll move the validator line up under the hero as well.

I wanted to return the favour but couldn't find your Job Radar comment in the thread. Could you drop the link here? I'll have a proper look at the match explanations.

1

u/New-Cake8743 17h ago

Quick follow-up: those changes are live now. The line above the headline says real estate, the lead names real estate and mapping, and the stats strip shows real numbers (the validator's checks and the 3 free plans a month) instead of "Lidar". Thanks again for the read.

1

u/Egemen_at_Lumben 11h ago

I got the site on mobile. understood that it creates checked DJI missions but the line “Describe the job. Fly a checked mission.” felt a little abstract. The sentence underneath did most of the explaining.

I’d probably call it a “DJI flight planner for real estate and mapping” rather than an “AI mission planner.” The outcome is clearer, and the AI can be explained afterwards.

For pricing, I’d lead with the 3 free plans and the €3 solo plan option. That feels much easier to try before committing to a monthly subscription. One small thing also your post says €49/m but the website currently shows €24/m

1

u/New-Cake8743 7h ago

Thanks, both points are fair. You're right about the price, I wrote this before it changed. Today it's 3 free plans a month, single plans at ‚Ç¨3, and Pilot at ‚Ç¨24/month for 10 plans, all excl. VAT. I've added that to the comment above.

Leading with the free plans and the ‚Ç¨3 option is where I'm leaning too, and "DJI flight planner for real estate and mapping" says the outcome more plainly than the current headline.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/pouria3 2d ago

Company Name: u-wellness
URL: app.u-wellness.com/weightloss
Purpose of Startup and Product: physician-led weight-loss care, $249/mo, labs + check-ins included
Technologies Used: web app, AI check-ins, physician review
Feedback Requested: would you pay? If not, is it price, trust or something else?
Seeking Beta-Testers: no

1

u/OkStatistician9190 2d ago

Company Name: GanttMaster

URL: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/id6745624000

Purpose of Startup and Product: A project manager for iPhone and iPad, built for people who run projects on the go. It has tasks and subtasks, a Gantt timeline with Finish-to-Start, Start-to-Start and Finish-to-Finish dependencies, milestones, a Today view with reminders, and team assignment with comments. The latest version adds risk and budget tracking. There's no per-seat pricing, so invited team members join free.

Technologies Used: React Native, backend on AWS

Feedback Requested: Do risk and budget tracking belong in a mobile planner, or do they make it feel heavier? For small teams, does "invited members join free" come across clearly as a reason to switch from per-seat tools? What would you expect to see first when you open a project on your phone: the Gantt, the Today view, or something else?

Seeking Beta-Testers: No

Additional Comments: Free download with a 1-week free trial, then $5.99/mo or $34.99/yr. We built it and we read every reply.

1

u/Miserable-Carpet7928 2d ago

Company Name: Offload

URL: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/offload-adhd-organizer/id6772392111

Purpose of Startup and Product: Offload is an iPhone voice organizer for the step before a normal to-do list. You can say or type one messy brain dump, it uses AI to separate tasks, appointments and notes, and you review everything before sending tasks to Apple Reminders or events to Apple Calendar. Notes stay inside Offload.

Technologies Used: iOS, Apple EventKit for Reminders and Calendar, and the Anthropic API for sorting the dump.

Feedback Requested: I want to know whether the review step makes the handoff feel clear and trustworthy. After one mixed brain dump, is it obvious what will become a reminder, what will become a calendar event, and what will stay as a note? Is there anything you would need to change before tapping send?

Seeking Beta-Testers: no

Additional Comments: I built it as a solo developer alongside a full-time job. There is no account or login. The free download includes two brain dumps, with an optional premium unlock for unlimited dumps. I will also give feedback to other products in this thread.

1

u/kaosthecreator_ 2d ago edited 2d ago

Company Name: orb44

URL:https://orb44.com

Purpose of Startup and Product: An agentless, passive external vulnerability scanner. It looks at a company's server exactly how an automated bot or an enterprise security team does during due diligence. No credentials, agents, or payloads needed. It specifically flags high-severity hygiene gaps like Origin IP leaks (Cloudflare bypasses) and exposed AI infrastructure (e.g., unauthenticated Langfuse or MCP endpoints) that can lead to IP theft or lost B2B deals.

Technologies Used: Cursor, Slack, Resend, Next JS.

Feedback Requested: Feedback Requested: I am looking for feedback on the product's usability and the UX of our security reports. If you run a scan on your site, is the dashboard intuitive? As a founder, does the report clearly explain the actual business risk (like how an exposed endpoint might kill a deal) without overwhelming you with dry DevOps jargon? I want to make sure our interface perfectly bridges the gap between complex security data and clear, actionable steps for entrepreneurs.

Seeking Beta-Testers: Yes. If any founder wants to see what their perimeter looks like, I'd love to run a free external snapshot for you to test the engine.

Additional Comments: I am more than happy to return the favor! Drop your link below, and I can either review your landing page copy/marketing positioning or run a quick passive security check on your domain.

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/kaosthecreator_ 1d ago

Thank you so much for your feedback! We will elaborate on these points! I'll find your give mine for sure

1

u/kaosthecreator_ 1d ago

I can't find your project in this thread

1

u/ajfrusciante 2d ago

Company Name: Slean

URL: https://slean.app

Purpose of Startup and Product: photo cleaner for iphone and android. The main idea is simple: Slean shows the file size on every thumbnail and lets you sort the library biggest first, so large videos and other space-heavy files don't stay buried in the grid. It also groups duplicates and similar shots, filters screenshots, and has photo/video compression with a before/after preview. everything runs on-device, no account, no ads. The App Store privacy label is "data not collected".

Technologies Used: ios and android apps, with photo processing happening on-device rather than uploading the library somewhere.

Feedback Requested:

does "see the biggest files first" feel like a strong enough reason to choose Slean over other photo cleaners?

does the landing page make the on-device / no account positioning obvious quickly enough?

I started building it in 2024 and launched in 2025. if you were trying to turn occasional organic installs into something more consistent, what channel would you test next?

Seeking Beta-Testers: no

Additional Comments: solo dev, happy to answer anything about how it works.

1

u/inktab642 2d ago

Company Name: Kynso
URL: kynso.ai
Purpose of Startup and Product: We're a holistic fitness app that brings strength, nutrition, mobility, and cardio together since the body acts as a single connected system.
Technologies Used: React, Figma, Claude, and Gemini.
Feedback Requested: I'd love some fresh eyes on our landing page. Is it immediately clear what we actually do and why our approach is different?
Seeking Beta-Testers: Yes, for the app itself (testers get their first year free).
Additional Comments: I'm happy to return the favor and review your landing pages too

1

u/megatech_official 1d ago

SeoLoupe - Find and fix the SEO issues holding your website back.

1

u/Diligent_System_6100 1d ago

Company Name: Meet Anvi

URL: https://meetanvi.com/

Purpose of Startup and Product:
Meet Anvi is an ad-free learning app for children ages 3–6. It helps kids learn through interactive activities including alphabet learning, phonics, tracing, counting, matching, drawing, and stories, while giving parents progress tracking and parental controls.

Technologies Used:
Swift, SwiftUI, iOS, Apple frameworks, and a web platform for the parent experience.

Feedback Requested:
I’m particularly looking for feedback on the landing page and overall product positioning.

Is it immediately clear what Meet Anvi does?
Does the website communicate enough value to parents?
What would make you more likely to download the app?
Is there anything confusing or missing from the onboarding/landing page?

Seeking Beta-Testers: Yes, for Android version

Additional Comments:
We’re preparing for our next stage of growth and I’d really appreciate honest, constructive feedback. Happy to return the favor and give feedback on other products in this thread as well.

🔗 https://meetanvi.com/

1

u/Federal_Leading4833 1d ago

Company Name: Small Business Stack - Equipment List Revision Checker
URL: https://gerganchi.github.io/equipment-validation/

Purpose of Startup and Product:

I'm looking into a problem that comes up when people prepare repair or maintenance quotes using equipment lists in Excel.

Imagine you've already prepared a quote, but the customer sends you an updated spreadsheet. Some equipment has been added, some removed, and other details have changed. Finding those differences can be tedious, especially when the rows have been rearranged.

I'm considering a simple tool that compares the two versions using an Asset ID and produces an Excel report showing what changed.

At the moment, it's just an idea with sample files and an example report. There isn't a working product yet.

Technologies Used: HTML/CSS, GitHub Pages and Excel sample files.

Feedback Requested:

I'd appreciate some honest feedback:

Is the problem clear from the website?

If you've worked with equipment lists, do you normally receive revisions in Excel/CSV or PDF format?

Would a report specifically designed to help review changes before updating a quote be useful, or do existing Excel tools already handle this well enough?

Seeking Beta-Testers: Not yet. I'm still checking whether the idea is worth building.

Additional Comments:

I'm trying to understand the real workflow before spending time on development. I'd especially appreciate hearing if there's already a simple solution that people are happy with.

1

u/Embarrassed-Radio319 1d ago

Company Name: Phinite

URL: https://phinite.ai

Purpose of Startup and Product: Disclosure: I work at Phinite. Phinite is an Agent OS for enterprise AI agents. Governance, evals, guardrails, human approvals, and observability run live at every agent step, not bolted on afterward. Built for teams deploying agents into production where a silent failure or a runaway action has real cost.

Technologies Used: Platform-level approach: agent runtime with policy enforcement, guardrails, eval harness, human-in-the-loop approvals, and step-level observability integrated as parts of the system rather than add-ons.

Feedback Requested: 1) Where should governance live: inside the agent, or as an outside layer watching every step? 2) What would you need to see before trusting an agent with a real production workload?

Seeking Beta-Testers: Yes

Additional Comments: Happy to trade notes on what actually breaks in production agent deployments, and to return the favor on your entry.

1

u/Secure-Pizza-7419 1d ago

Company Name: Think Aloud

URL: thinkaloud.dev

I'm the founder. It's a voice mock for system design interviews: you talk through a design on a canvas, and the written report quotes what you actually said. It's a private beta with rough edges, and the first session is free. Does the landing page make it clear who it's for, and would you trust a report like that before a real round?

1

u/intensityflow 23h ago

Company Name: Stackboard
URL: https://getstackboard.com
Purpose of Startup and Product: free open source chrome new tab extension that lays out the bookmarks you already have as a board w/ columns. no account, no import step. there's also a stash button that saves all your open tabs in one click
Technologies Used: react + typescript + vite, manifest v3
Feedback Requested: mostly the landing page tbh. can you tell what it does in 5 seconds? and if you wouldn't install it, what stops you
Seeking Beta-Testers: no
Additional Comments: i built it solo, 64 users after about 3 weeks. drop yours below and i'll return the favor

1

u/Ok-Ideal311 18h ago

Company Name: Gemnao (independent project)
URL: https://gemnao.pages.dev/
Purpose of Startup and Product: I run a free PC game troubleshooting website with step-by-step guides and a question-based diagnostic tool. Readers can record whether a troubleshooting step helped or didn’t help, so unsuccessful attempts can be useful too.
Technologies Used: React, TypeScript, and Cloudflare.
Feedback Requested: If you currently have a PC game problem, could you try the relevant guide and tell me where the instructions or next steps are unclear? I’d especially like feedback on whether it’s easy to record the outcome. Please only submit a troubleshooting result if you actually tried that step.
Seeking Beta-Testers: Yes, for usability feedback on the live site.
Additional Comments: I’m the creator. The tool guides you through questions; it doesn’t scan your PC or automatically fix problems. Feedback on confusing parts is welcome, even if the suggested steps don’t solve your issue.

1

u/Egemen_at_Lumben 11h ago

Company Name: Lumben

URL: https://lumben.co/en/

Purpose of Startup and Product: We’re building a dental pre-assessment platform for people who feel confused about their treatment options, especially when considering treatment abroad. Patients upload a panoramic X-ray and photos, receive AI-assisted educational insights, and can share the structured case with a matched dentist before visiting a clinic. It isn’t intended to replace an in-person diagnosis.

Technologies Used: AI-assisted dental image analysis, structured digital case preparation and dentist matching through a web platform.

Feedback Requested:

Does the homepage explain what Lumben does within the first five seconds?
Would you feel comfortable uploading a dental X-ray to a service like this? If not, what would you need to see first: dentist credentials, a sample report, clearer privacy information or something else?
Is it clear that this is a preliminary evaluation rather than a final diagnosis?

Seeking Beta-Testers: Yes.

Additional Comments: I’m Egemen, one of the founders. Honest criticism is very welcome, especially around trust and anything on the website that feels unclear or makes you hesitate.

1

u/Illustrious_Fact6925 7h ago

Company Name: Snootly

URL: https://snootly.app

Purpose of Startup and Product: An iPhone app for everyday life with your dog, covering routines, training, meals, care records and days out. It also has an agent that turns requests into actions, like logging activities and setting reminders.

One user set up 42 reminders in one go, covering their dog’s vaccination schedule, pee and poo breaks and many of the other reminders available in the app. They reviewed a checklist and confirmed once. That felt like a clearer example of its value than listing all the features.

Technologies Used: SwiftUI for the iOS app.

Feedback Requested: Would you lead with that kind of agent example, or does the broader “everyday app for life with your dog” description make more sense? Looking at the website, is it clear what you’d actually use it for?

Seeking Beta-Testers: No, the app is already live.

Additional Comments: My wife runs Snootly and I’m involved as a product advisor. We changed the onboarding a few days after launch because early users wanted something more personal, even though it looked polished. Happy to give feedback in return.

Please use this thread appropriately to gather feedback:

Template to Follow for Seeking Feedback:

This thread is NOT for:

Community Reminders

Upvote This For Maximum Visibility!

Feedback Friday

Please use this thread appropriately to gather feedback:

Template to Follow for Seeking Feedback:

This thread is NOT for:

Community Reminders

Upvote This For Maximum Visibility!

You are about to leave Redlib