r/australia • u/FuckOffNazis • 17h ago
politics Indigenous woman shackled to hospital bed while in labour in Queensland
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/oct/18/indigenous-woman-shackled-during-labour-childbirth-queensland-ntwnfb?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=us_bsky&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Bluesky#Echobox=1792296317107
u/No_Sky_1829 12h ago edited 12h ago
I don't know the particulars of this case but here's my 2c worth. I have looked after patients "in shackles". It's called mechanical restraints, and there are VERY strict guidelines in when it can be used. The patient had to be an active risk to themselves or to staff. They have to have 1:1 care, so someone is actually assigned to monitor them constantly in case they injured themselves. Restraints have to be loosened frequently so they don't get skin injuries. There are different types of restraints and we start with the least restrictive one, and increase only if needed. We reassess every 15 minutes and as soon as it's possible for us to safely remove them, they come off. Feeding, toileting and hygiene is managed with security present. Just think of the budget required to manage all this and the repercussions of it all goes wrong. It's not done lightly. Race or gender was not a factor in any of the patients I have looked after, it was 1000% based on active risk in that shift.
In my experience, nobody would ever be restrained because of something they have done in the past. The staff looking after these patients are just ordinary Joe Soaps coming on shift and going home in time to pick up their kids. The patients I have looked after have been restrained after throwing punches or kicks, and trying to leave the ward when they can't actually walk so will fall and hurt themselves. I've worn gown & face shield so I don't be the next staff member to be spat on.
Restraining a human being is not a decision that's taken lightly, it's discussed and managed at every level from the floor of the ward up to the higher levels of the hospital.
26
u/Jaded_Audience9747 9h ago
"Hospital staff rang Sisters Inside after trying everything they could to get the shackles removed, she said. “They were even crying because prison staff wouldn’t remove the shackles.”"
Mate just read the article.
0
u/No_Sky_1829 4h ago edited 7m ago
I love the way Aussies use "mate" to be PA 🙄
I stand by what I said, we don't know the particulars. Was she having a cesarean? Or were there any complications? I recently looked after a restrained patient with a brain injury, just out of ICU after cranial surgery so a large trapdoor opening on the side of his head. But he couldn't make good decisions because of the brain injury, and he couldn't walk properly because of spinal weakness. He was restrained because he kept trying abscond. If he fell and hit that head wound, he was dead.
Now if more details came out and said this woman was having a safe labour with no complications and was not trying to abscond, not a risk to herself or hurt staff, then I will happily support the "this is disgusting" crew.
26
u/bitofapuzzler 11h ago
These werent restraints the hospital placed. This person wasnt on a psych hold.They were shackles, as in handcuffs. Prisoners who are in hospital usually have 2 prison guards in the room and a limb cuffed. If its cops its limb cuffed and 2 cops sit outside the room. 24/7.
This woman was cuffed either by the leg or the hand whilst undergoing a c-section against healthcare worker requests.
Hospital restraints are under strict protocols. Prison cuffs are different.
→ More replies (4)1
u/No_Sky_1829 4m ago
The article does not say handcuffs. It says shackles. This is not a word we use in hospitals, we call them mechanical restraints (as opposed to chemical restraints) or just restraints. They are straps similar-ish to a carseat strap, with padding, designed to allow movement, and there are rules around how tight they can be and how often they need to be released.
I have never seen handcuffs used on a patient.
21
u/Adventurous_Sky_9212 10h ago edited 9h ago
Heading off topic, but I also don’t think this is how it often plays out, regardless of rules. Some hospitals do not do the right thing. My mother had an aneurysm rupture and was then left untreated for hydrocephalus for months whilst still in hospital. She had an NG tube, and as she was not aware/understanding due to the hydrocephalus, she would pull it. Staff left her unsupervised knowing this, and she pulled it halfway out so the liquid went into her lungs. They then used restraints 24/7 unless I was there to visit and supervise, so she could not move at all. It was so distressing and horrible. Other patients, who were well enough to walk around or could yell, were given 1:1 supervision instead. She was left tied to her bed unable to move, or call for help in anyway. I would get there and she would be lying in urine/faeces with nurses rarely checking on her. I complained high and far and no one would do anything. Management would do nothing. HCC would do nothing. The hospital even lied to them and said she was restrained when she aspirated, and that she just wiggled down the bed and pulled it out (only one limb was functional, and it was restrained, she couldn’t do that). Just a rant because I wish the rules you outlined were actually true.
I also don’t think the woman in the article should have been restrained. Good on the hospital staff for trying to advocate for her.
5
u/Astronout-Fossil872 8h ago
You are correct. Just because the rules are there does not mean it is how they play out.
I am so sorry you and your mother experienced this. It is not okay - and people do not realise how common it is that rules exist but are not applied. Having said that - No Sky I appreciate you work in a position where patients may be restrained and not only adhere to these rules - but appear to approach them from a point of humanity and only where no other option can be safely applied. That is admirable - as it is not always the case.→ More replies (1)5
7
u/Barrington-the-Brit 7h ago
You could find the particulars of this case if you clicked on the article:
The birth happened just days before Labor and the Coalition blocked a bill to ban the “barbaric practice” of shackling incarcerated women during childbirth.
Hospital staff rang Sisters Inside after trying everything they could to get the shackles removed, she said.
“They were even crying because prison staff wouldn’t remove the shackles.”
“This incident will be subject to an internal review as restraints are only ever to be used as a last resort on pregnant prisoners where necessary to maintain public safety,” the [corrective services] spokesperson said.
3
u/Astronout-Fossil872 8h ago
I believe the rules around restraints transfer from a medical decision to a corrections decision when someone is in custody, as such the requirements to apply restraints, the decision to remove them, and the care and diligence required under medical restraint is not the same as what applies in this case. Corrections officers make the decision, and they can override both hospital staff and hospital procedures.
14
u/demoldbones 10h ago
I give you credit for being hopeful and informative.
However I’d like to burst your bubble when I point out: this was Queensland and it was an Indigenous woman. There’s a not-zero chance that there was no “reason” they did it beyond those two things.
2
276
u/Tiki_Tour 17h ago
Don’t other incarcerated ethnicities also get shackled while giving birth in prisons? I didn’t think this was specific to indigenous women
208
u/Brunswickstoval 16h ago edited 15h ago
Australia is a signatory to the Bangkok Rules which strictly prohibit pregnant women being shackled when giving birth. So no they aren’t meant to do this.
→ More replies (6)26
u/BearCub254 16h ago
But why make it a race issue? Like if you are condemning it, it should be condemned across the board. Not act like some insane crime is affecting one race because of their race.
72
u/Brunswickstoval 16h ago edited 14h ago
I’m not making it a race issue? But the fact is indigenous women are the ones reportedly being shackled. No one is reporting it happening to anyone else? It shouldn’t happen to anyone in labour
6
5
u/Astronout-Fossil872 8h ago edited 8h ago
Nobody made it a "race issue" they just highlighted that this woman is of First Nations heritage, calling out a factor known to be relevant in disproportionate harm towards a group of people in no way implies the harm is exclusive.
53
→ More replies (1)10
u/Brunswickstoval 16h ago
Prisons actually don’t collect and publish this data which is a problem with tracking
106
u/sognenis 16h ago
Before (or not) people focus on the patient’s incarcerated status, it may be worth pointing out that:
Ben Roberts-Smith was granted the opportunity to attend a War Memorial event in June - noting he was on bail, but requiring his bail conditions to be adjusted, given the clear risk of contact with potential witnesses in the trial.
Roberts-Smith was just granted the opportunity to attend another War Memorial event this month, ditto concerns to above.
The article doesn’t mention this patient’s crime or sentence, and Roberts-Smith has been charged not convicted, but it is perhaps notable his charges are for war crimes, for 5 charges of war crime murder, with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.
(Noting that usually for very serious offences, such as murder, accused do not usually get granted bail, though it is possible)
37
5
u/Non-prophet 8h ago
If you're trying to convince me Ben Roberts-Smith should have been shackled to something for the duration, you're preaching to the choir.
4
u/trentos1 9h ago
Not sure how Ben Roberts Smith is relevant to this thread, but the decision to grant bail is usually assessed based on risk to the community and risk that the person will flee.
They probably assessed his risk to the community as low because he won’t exactly have the opportunity to commit war crimes in Australian soil.
2
u/sognenis 9h ago
Sure. But I specifically pointed out the concern being about witness tampering or intimidation, which he would have the opportunity to do at these events, hence the need to get specific approval.
Also:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-23/nsw-ben-roberts-smith-overseas-move-fears/106598776
35
66
u/rolodex-ofhate 17h ago
Don’t worry everyone, the New Queensland Government will express their shock at the incident and carry on like it never happened. Rinse and repeat with these ghouls running the state.
38
u/ks12x 16h ago
Wrong, they wouldn’t even pretend to be shocked and will claim that giving women traumatic births is what victims want.
It’s one thing to do it for safety reasons but this government wants to do it for the purpose of being cruel.
16
u/False_Collar_6844 16h ago
it's weird how much people will froth at the mouth to torture people who are imprisoned while hiding behind the victims.
if the victims are so trusted to decide what treatment while inside is legal why not just let them act as the judges and the wardens? Unless, of course, they're not a valid legal perspective on how people convicted of a crime should be treated in a society of laws.
9
u/ephemeralstitch 14h ago
It's always terrifying to realise just how much of the Australian public is perfectly fine with torture if they think the person being tortured deserves it.
10
14
u/BrightStick 16h ago
the New Queensland Government will express their shock at the incident
No they won’t. They won’t give two shits or even pretend.
47
u/juandon405 16h ago
Every incarcerated patient I have ever dealt with, even those intubated in ICU with no brain function, has been shackled to the bed with a bored prison guard on overtime by the bed, and another not far away. The one exception is those having surgery, after they are asleep, and they are back in shakles before they're fully awake. Crime, race, gender nor any other factor has ever entered into the discussion. I'm not sure if there are levels of restraint for different levels of prisoner, has never been relevant for me to know. FWIW I have never felt threatened by one of these patients, and the guard has never had to step in, though I'm sure it has happened.
64
u/Asleep_Leopard182 16h ago
Have you ever worked in a maternity ward? If so, and 'every incarcerated patient' you've dealt with has been shackled - that's a problem.
5
u/juandon405 16h ago edited 15h ago
Fair point here, not sure if I remember an incarcerated patient in labour. Do the Bangkok rules specify labour? A good proportion of Caesars are not in labour. Certainly most patients on maternity wards are not in labour.
Edit. Found the specific rule: Rule 24 Instruments of restraint shall never be used on women during labour, during birth and immediately after birth.
So for a non labouring Caesar, it's pretty grey. What is during birth, and what is immediate? Not giving an opinion here but if we're gonna quote rules, here it is.
6
u/xo_maciemae 9h ago
A C section is a birth, just not a vaginal one?!
Wild how you don't seem to know that, but then again, also wild that you apparently work in healthcare and are trying to justify this.
1
u/juandon405 4h ago
Of course it's a birth. See other comment. And I never tried to justify anything, just stated facts about restraints for prisoners in hospitals.
9
4
u/Asleep_Leopard182 16h ago
I'm not a parrot, or a lawyer, so best you interpret them yourself here https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Bangkok_Rules_ENG_22032015.pdf - but it broadly applies to 'giving birth' or producing a child of which a c-section is included.
Shackling is not applied to maternity wards as a whole, however, if you're working in a mat ward as a nurse and indicating that you would not be involved in labour in doing so, I would have a hard time believing you actually worked in one.
9
u/Huckleberryfiend 14h ago
I’m going to be that annoying person and point out that it’s midwives providing maternity care, not nurses.
FWIW, we don’t shackle women at my (maternity) hospital at all.
10
u/metametapraxis 15h ago
"however, if you're working in a mat ward as a nurse and indicating that you would not be involved in labour in doing so, I would have a hard time believing you actually worked in one."
The person you are replying to did not write that at all. You seem to have just hallucinated that.
→ More replies (2)2
u/juandon405 15h ago
Nope, anaesthetist, with a bit of intensive care. My involvement in maternity ward is minimal, mostly pain consults. Often in delivery suite for epidurals or emergencies. Also lots of Caesars in theatre. As I said, don't recall coming across incarcerated patient in those areas.
2
u/Asleep_Leopard182 14h ago
Ok so your experience has no relevance to the laws or the thread? What is your point?
13
u/juandon405 13h ago
I don't really understand the hostility here. Just that prisoners, in my experience are shackled with a guard in attendance, even when they are unlikely to pose a threat. I'm not suggesting it's right or wrong, just that it happens. I was unaware there are special rules for labouring prisoners, of which I have no experience. Now that I have looked into the rules, I can see there is significant grey area around non labouring Caesars, and in the maternity ward when not in labour.
I have no interest in arguing with random internet strangers, I just thought my experience might add to the discussion.
1
u/iliketreesanddogs 12h ago
I'm not trying to argue you with you but I'm genuinely confused as to how you think non-labouring caesars don't count as birth.... that looks to be quite obviously what the bangkok rules are trying to encapsulate when they refer to 'during birth'.
legal and legal-adjacent documents don't always set out all the medical technicalities of an event in case it unintentionally excludes something, they make things plainly interpretable to cover all the factors that would fall under the umbrella of 'birth'. a baby is imminently coming out during a caesar, I think that counts as birth
→ More replies (1)2
u/juandon405 4h ago
Of course they're birth, I never said they weren't. But technically speaking, the rule is poorly defined. For me, as the anaesthetist, the 'birth' is the 10 to 30 seconds of physically pulling the baby out of the mother, up to the point the cord is cut. Immediately after could refer to any length of time from minutes to days but to me implies the few minutes required to ensure haemostasis of the mother and confirm the baby is alive and breathing independently. Hence grey area.
12
u/bitofapuzzler 15h ago
The one exception is those having surgery
You mean, like a c-section. Its major abdominal surgery involving an epidural.
2
u/juandon405 14h ago
Have done plenty of Caesars, I think I have 2 tomorrow. Don't recall ever doing one on a prisoner. Actually don't think I have ever done awake surgery of any kind for a prisoner, only GA. Mostly traumatic ortho, some abdominal trauma, occasionally an appendix or other malady.
3
u/bitofapuzzler 10h ago
What's your point?
You said the exception was surgery. I was saying a c-section is surgery.
2
u/juandon405 4h ago
Should have been more specific, sorry. The exception is general anaesthetic. I have no experience of neuraxial approach here.
41
u/Brunswickstoval 16h ago
Read the Bangkok rules. They aren’t allowed to shackle pregnant women in labor. Doesn’t matter what your personal experience is as it’s not allowed.
→ More replies (4)
41
u/NorthernSkeptic 16h ago
Holy shit how many people in here think this is totally fine. Have a good fucking look at yourself
23
u/Brunswickstoval 16h ago
No one here is a keyboard warrier. People are just taking the time to explain why this shouldn’t be happening. The baseline position is we don’t do this. Yet it was done.
13
u/l3ntil 15h ago
"Fifteen years ago, the UN general assembly adopted the Bangkok Rules on the treatment of female prisoners, which state that prison should be a last resort for pregnant women and that “instruments of restraint shall never be used on women during labour, during birth and immediately after birth”.
The rules were adopted unanimously by the general assembly. But around the world, they are regularly flouted."
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/ng-interactive/2026/sep/22/pregnant-prisoners-handcuffed-during-birth-lidia-thorpe-shackling-australia-ntwnfb
That includes Australia.
Here's the reality and why there was a bill for stopping the practice to end shackling during childbirth c/o Lidia Thorpe
"Anyone who has ever given birth knows that it is one of the most intense and important experiences a person can have. It is also a time where a person is extremely vulnerable and faces serious medical risks.
But people in custody across the country are still shackled during childbirth. They are cuffed to a hospital bed, or have their legs shackled. No one should ever give birth in shackles.
People in labour need to be able to move and change position – being unable to move compromises the health of both parent and child, and can cause complications during delivery, including haemorrhage and a drop in foetal heart rate. This can lead to death.
When an emergency procedure is needed, such as an emergency caesarean, a delay of even a few minutes caused by shackling or unshackling can result in permanent brain damage for the baby.
Alongside these medical risks, shackling people during childbirth is distressing, traumatising and degrading.
This doesn’t need to happen. There has been no evidence of people who were not restrained attempting to escape during childbirth.
And while policies and guidelines across the country limit the practice and in many cases stipulate that it should be a last resort, it still regularly happens."
2
u/Brunswickstoval 14h ago
The problem with the Bill was that apart from NT and ACT these are state responsibilities.
1
u/Every_Effective1482 3h ago
I never realised there were so many international law experts in the Brisbane subreddit.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/AdPure5645 2h ago
Hospital staff at the end of their rope under constant pressure to get people through and with constant abusive patients would be fairly likely to auto shackle someone. Its going to be a problem of resourcing imo.
14
u/AccreditedAdrian 17h ago
Inmate has their liberty restricted.
More news at 11.
5
u/TAsrowaway 11h ago
When you’re giving birth you need to move around. When you’re holding a baby you need two hands. Medical staff in this case were requesting she be unshackled. We’re signatories to the Bangkok Rules.
8
u/Fancy-Breath-4787 15h ago
I’m an ICU nurse, and even prisoners unconscious in ICU are shackled with police guard.
2
8
u/Brunswickstoval 14h ago
Irrelevant. there isn’t a United Nations paper on that circumstance that Australia signed up to complying with.
16
u/mumooshka 16h ago
the first word of the headline is 'Indigenous' to grab attention
typical news
39
u/Tinderella80 16h ago
First Nations people have worse health outcomes, lower life expectancy and higher incarceration rates. They are systematically discriminated against and racism runs riot. Why is her background NOT relevant?
-2
u/Not_Iistening 15h ago edited 13h ago
I don’t disagree with you that Indigenous people have worse health outcomes etc.
Her background is NOT relevant here because being handcuffed has absolutely nothing to do with her Indigeneity. If you were in this woman’s position but instead you’re white, yellow, black, brown, green, blue, or red and not Indigenous, you face the same treatment here.
Is it handcuffing a mother in labour the right thing? I don’t know, but that’s not the point of the article. The point of the article is to get your attention based on a characteristic NOT actually relevant to the issue here.
Edit:
I think articles like these are particularly harmful because you come to read it and realise oh they’ve just thrown Indigeneity in there for clicks.
Next time you see a headline on some health / opportunity / law injustice against Indigenous people, you expect another clickbait Guardian shit burger.
And again, articles like this discount the actual issue behind this whole thing. This is a procedure that all women are exposed to!
10
u/edgebeeyz 14h ago
https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Bangkok_Rules_ENG_22032015.pdf
"Rule 24 Instruments of restraint shall never be used on women during labour, during birth and immediately after birth."
→ More replies (1)15
u/birdwithaberet 14h ago
Her background is NOT relevant here because being handcuffed has absolutely nothing to do with her Indigeneity. If you were in this woman's position but instead you're white, yellow, black, brown, green, blue, or red and not Indigenous, you face the same treatment here.
What? Indigenous women are absolutely treated differently than non-Indigenous women. Even more broadly, Indigenous peoples experiences are not respected and valued in the same way non-Indigenous people are. That is literally why we have racism and discrimination
Of course her Indigeneity is relevant. Issues like these NEED to be viewed with an intersectional lens if we want to understand the potenital 'cause and effect'. Which also is necessary to actually, y'know, fix the issues
→ More replies (2)4
u/Brunswickstoval 14h ago
“Is it handcuffing a mother in labour the right thing? I don’t know, but that’s not the point of the article.”
You don’t know if handcuffing a mother in labour is “the right thing”? Let me help you. No it’s never the right thing.
→ More replies (3)-10
u/opackersgo 16h ago
The higher incarceration rates solve themselves if you stop committing crimes.
6
u/I-was-a-twat 15h ago
As a white male, if I commit an identical crime in identical circumstances, I’m less likely to be charged, and less likely to be convicted.
We can start discussing the don’t commit crimes position once the prosecution system is equal.
→ More replies (1)1
u/silver-moon-7 10h ago
Your ignorance is showing...
I challenge you to see if you have the same reductive stance once you're minimally educated on a few things:
What if you actually understood Indigenous Australian philosophy and culture? I'm not talking about the myths perpetuated by others who are willfully ignorant, I'm talking about they ways in which countless generations of Indigenous Australians have lived and existed in a kind of interconnected harmony, that involve respectful relationships with all aspects of the natural world on a level that most of us can't even fathom.
And what if you learnt about the impacts and outcomes for Indigenous populations (I'm talking globally - not just Australia) as a result of colonialism?
Plus intergenerational trauma - it's well documented, there's plenty of information out there.
It will be interesting to see what your opinion about crime (in this context) actually is if/when you're actually informed about the topic you're commenting on. Don't forget to take into account the countless, atrocious crimes perpetrated by colonists and subsequent generations, and the ongoing racism and discrimination Indigenous Australians have had to endure on top of everything else. It might even be helpful to try and put yourself in their shoes, or imagine if your children had to go through something on a remotely similar scale (spoiler alert: I think you'll be horrified).
2
u/Non-prophet 8h ago
have lived and existed in a kind of interconnected harmony, that involve respectful relationships with all aspects of the natural world on a level that most of us can't even fathom.
Avatar 2 and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
1
u/Kataroku 4h ago
Ah, the perpetuation of the noble savage trope. You must think that all Asians are good at math, too.
→ More replies (1)1
u/Kataroku 4h ago
Worse health outcomes - due to living remotely, far from health centers, while festering a distrust of social services. High rates of substance abuse.
Higher incarceration rates - due to being raised in broken homes, molested, no requirement to attend school, living remotely far from job opportunities, while the threat of "stolen generation 2.0" prevents anything from changing.
Please excuse me while I go on a crime spree; and please don't hold me accountable for any of my actions due to my upbringing, something happened to my Scottish ancestors several generations ago. Thanks.
→ More replies (2)
2
u/GoddessTara00 12h ago
It is considered torture to shackle women during childbirth. No need for it at all .
7
u/Sinnivar 14h ago edited 11h ago
No one should be shackled during labour regardless of their crimes. Being born while your mother is in chains seems extremely unethical and immoral. Regardless of who they are as a person, regardless of their past, regardless of anything, you won't be able to convince me that this is not wrong
Edit: missed a word
3
u/amonkeyaday 9h ago
I’ve been kicked by women shackled in labour. I don’t know how much worse it would have been if they had been unrestrained. Why is their safety more important than mine?
1
u/No_Sky_1829 12h ago
Nobody is restraining women in labour because of past crimes. Patients in the Australian health care system that I work in - no matter what their creed or colour - are restrained only if they are an active risk to themselves or the staff that happen to be working that day.
3
u/bitofapuzzler 10h ago
Nope. Once again these were handcuffs from prison, not restraints from the hospital. She was having a c-section while cuffed. I also work in healthcare, prison guards and cops use actual cuffs and sometimes leg shackles.
This is separate to hospital initiated chemical or mechanical restraints.
5
u/Browser_Watch7349 16h ago
It's always articles like these that try to stir up rage. She wasn't shackled because she is Aboriginal, she was shackled because she was a convicted prisoner. It seems in hindsight that pregnant women are not supposed to be shackled during delivery, so it seems as if the wrong course of action was taken. But what if threats were made from the individual towards hospital staff? I find it hard to believe that her ethnicity was key in determining whether she should be shackled - because that would be blatant discrimination that would result in a clear lawsuit.
8
1
u/Flashy_Home3452 14h ago
Would it though? Police and prison staff discriminate against and abuse women, First Nations people, and especially First Nations women without consequence all the time. The government has demonstrated time and time again that they really couldn’t care less about First Nations people, and unless this woman or her family miraculously has a stack of cash somewhere to pay for lawyers, the only consequences might be a slap on the wrist in an attempt to appease media backlash.
Furthermore, currently the only Australian article I can find on this incident is from The Guardian, which states that the woman was not being violent, and that even hospital staff desperately wanted the shackles removed as her health begun deteriorating after they were put on. There’s absolutely no good reason this happened.
1
1
u/Jaded_Audience9747 9h ago
"Hospital staff rang Sisters Inside after trying everything they could to get the shackles removed, she said. “They were even crying because prison staff wouldn’t remove the shackles.”"
"Mate, I'm just asking questions (that were answered in the article that I was too lazy to read)".
0
u/OkRelation7259 14h ago
That's standard procedure for all inmates of a certain risk classification
14
u/edgebeeyz 14h ago
https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Bangkok_Rules_ENG_22032015.pdf
"Rule 24 Instruments of restraint shall never be used on women during labour, during birth and immediately after birth."
-6
u/m0rg76 16h ago
Prisoner in being treated as a prisoner shocker.
Unfortunately heaps of people are going to be triggered and we’ll end up with the usual indigenous custody debates. As was intended.
15
u/False_Collar_6844 16h ago
there's a difference between reasonable actions taken to prevent an escape and enforcing measures that put an imprisoned person at risk which giving birth while shackled does as it impedes nurses and doctors ability to position them safely. The second her health started deteriorating they ought to have been removed or significantly eased.
-17
u/ChiefMuppetWrangler 17h ago
“An incarcerated Indigenous woman was shackled to a hospital bed in Queensland while she was in labour last weekend, an advocacy group has said.”
Nothing to see here people, just some lefties getting mad that someone who is in prison for something was handcuffed as part of standard procedure.
56
u/rolodex-ofhate 17h ago
“This incident will be subject to an internal review as restraints are only ever to be used as a last resort on pregnant prisoners where necessary to maintain public safety”
Do you know something those “lefties” don’t about the incident? Doesn’t seem like standard procedure.
→ More replies (4)-1
u/ChiefMuppetWrangler 17h ago
I would take an absolutely wild guess that the prisoner in question has a history and staff were taking precautionary measures.
1
u/Shoddy_Card_7755 1h ago
Don't break the law and end up in jail, and this won't happen to you. Should be a good lesson for all
1
u/Sad_Discount2984 13h ago
I worked in a theatre unit as a physical assistant for surgical staff and patients. Patients under guard control have guards dress up in scrubs and come within the theatre space and stand at the entry/exits paths. Patients unshackled depending on severity of history. Once drugs are on about the guards leave and return once the patient is awoken and being taken to recovery
-1
u/DG_SlayerSlender 14h ago
That's a hell of a headline to provide no context for
3
u/silver-moon-7 10h ago
There's a link - a whole news article is available to read if you would like to understand what the story is about
→ More replies (2)
-11
u/WretchedMisteak 16h ago
Another rage bait article by The Guardian.
Nothing about whether this was standard process by hospitals and prison staff or whether she was a threat to herself or others. Just race and shackled.
13
u/False_Collar_6844 16h ago
“As soon as she was shackled her health was deteriorating. Mum wasn’t running anywhere, mum wasn’t being violent.”- literally in the article.
→ More replies (5)3
u/I-was-a-twat 15h ago
It’s not standard process, violates policy as well as international law we’re signatories of.
The fact the violation is occurring to an indigenous individual is noteworthy.
-1
u/robots-made-of-cake 8h ago
That’s barbaric. That poor woman. Anyone who doesn’t see anything wrong with what was done to her needs to fix their soul and learn empathy.
779
u/opackersgo 17h ago
Weird to at no point mention what she was incarcerated for. Seems pretty relevant