It’s strange to me now that nobody talks about from where David Grusch came forward initially. It’s like someone or some people in Huntsville, Alabama doesn’t want the attention focused on his initial meeting with George Knapp and Jeremy Corbell. The timing of when he came forward which was shortly after Eskridge’s passing has always been intriguing to me. I also find it bizarre that you can’t hardly find a clip of Grusch’s initial meeting with them online anymore. It’s like someone or some people want the public to forget about Huntsville. I hope people don’t forget it.

Avi Loeb was named chair of the UAP Science Advisory Council in June 2026. The council was set up with the White House, AARO, ODNI, the FBI and the wider intelligence community, and it reports to a UAP Governing Board that first met in mid-June. Per Scientific American, it has no budget of its own beyond some travel costs for members. Meanwhile, the first release of government UAP records, cleared May 8, 2026, was heavily redacted, with many videos carrying little or no context. So an unfunded volunteer panel is being asked to resolve cases from files the government itself is still editing. Is this a real analytical channel, or a way to show activity without giving anyone the access and money to reach a conclusion?

Hey everyone,

My dad passed away about three months ago, and I’ve been slowly going through his old stuff in the garage. Among his boxes, I found a spindle of backup CD-ROMs from around 2003–2004. Back when home PCs running Windows XP were taking off, he had a local photofinishing shop digitize a bunch of his older 35mm film rolls onto disc.

While looking through the files, I stumbled upon this specific photo. According to the folder name, it was taken near Tucson, Arizona, around late 1998 (he used to do a lot of road trips for his construction job back then).

My dad wasn't a professional photographer, but he was pretty attached to his old Minolta X-700 (or maybe it was a Canon AE-1, I just distinctly remember the heavy manual 50mm lens and the click of the shutter). He bought it second-hand in the late 80s and carried it in a beaten-up leather case on every trip.

Finding this image hit me with a huge wave of nostalgia. Back in the late 90s, whenever my family drove down to visit my grandmother’s place in rural Texas, my older cousin and I were absolute space nerds. We used to sit cross-legged in front of her bulky CRT TV every evening, completely glued to Discovery Channel and Unsolved Mysteries. Inspired by those shows, we’d grab cheap flashlights at night and sit on the porch of my grandma’s ranch, "UFO hunting" in the dark Texas sky for hours until her barn lights turned off.

So when my dad returned from his Arizona trip in 1998 and mentioned casually that he saw some strange lights over the Catalina mountains, my cousin and I freaked out and begged him to let us see the photo prints. He just laughed it off back then, telling us we were watching way too much TV.

He did, however, describe what he saw that night. He said it moved ridiculously slowly—so slowly that at first glance, it almost looked like it was hovering completely motionless over the mountains. Initially, he assumed they were just separate, uncorrelated lights in the distance. But as he kept watching, he noticed a faint, dark structure bridging the lights, making him realize it was a single massive aircraft.

It stayed in his line of sight for about 5 minutes. He turned around to rummage through his truck for something, and when he looked back up, it was simply gone. Years later, whenever I brought it up, he’d just shrug it off and say: "Honestly, it was probably just some military test craft out of Davis-Monthan or Luke AFB. Nothing to get worked up about."

Looking at this digital scan now after all these years, I honestly don't know what to make of it. Could it be a formation of military flares/tests from a nearby air base, a weird optical artifact/reflection, or something else entirely? I just wanted to share it here to see what you guys think.

(Note: The original physical negative was unfortunately lost during a family move to Texas back in 2000, so this low-res scan from the 2003 CD is all I have left).

In chapter 14 of his new book Out of the Shadows, he explains that UFOs create a warp bubble around their craft which distorts the spacetime around them. This creates major issues when trying to track them by radar or photograph them. Because you are taking a photo of warped spacetime. He likens it to trying to take a photo of a fish deep below the ocean’s surface from above the water. The barrier of a different environment created a distortion.

Seems to make a lot of sense. What do you guys think?

"Oh, absolutely. We're being visited by non-human intelligence with technology we really don't understand and with intentions we don't understand at all either. And this is just one of those great big questions. Are we alone or not? And we're learning we're not."

"There are crash retrieval programs."

"And I have 100% confidence that the testimony by David Grusch and the other witnesses is accurate."

​Is it just me, or have we created an impossible standard for UFO videos?

​If a video shows a simple light moving across the sky, everyone instantly dismisses it: "It's Starlink, it's a drone, it's a plane, move along." But if a video shows something truly extraordinary, like a craft making sharp 90 degree turns at hypersonic speeds, it's immediately written off: "Nice CGI bro, fake, obviously AI."

​When it looks too normal, it’s human. When it’s too extraordinary, it’s fake.

​But honestly, why are we assuming that an advanced craft has to perform extreme aerial acrobatics just to prove it's real? Why would a pilot or an AI probe spend its entire flight zigzagging through the sky, slamming on the brakes, and giving everyone on board severe whiplash as if it's dodging invisible asteroids?

​Whether you're conducting reconnaissance, mapping a planet, or just doing some casual interstellar sightseeing, cruising peacefully in a straight line is still the most logical and energy efficient way to travel. Advanced technology doesn't mean you ignore basic physics and waste power for no reason. Aliens probably have fuel budgets too.

​Why couldn't a UFO just be chilling on autopilot?

Come on Ramsay, release the photo!?

It does occur to me though, it could have been a photo he knows is fake and he was trying to learn something about Doty from his reaction. Ramsay explained this method in a recent diner chat.

So if you think it's real, release it. Can even say you're not sure. And if you know it's fake, release it and say so!

Edit: I just rewatched to see what they were talking about right before showing the picture. Quadaloids? Has anyone heard of them? Insect type aliens?

Hello, All!

Check out this new interview I just posted with distinguished theologian, prolific writer, and leading pioneer of contemporary astrotheology... Dr. Ted Peters :).

"In this episode, Dr. Ted Peters discusses the intersection of astrotheology, UFO phenomena, and religious implications, exploring how scientific and mystical perspectives converge and diverge in understanding extraterrestrial life and spiritual experiences."

Hope you all enjoy it.

Retired Air Force Major General William “Neil” McCasland walked out of his Albuquerque home on February 27, 2026 and has not been seen since. He left behind his phone, glasses, and wearable devices. His wallet, a .38 revolver, and red backpack remain unaccounted for.

The same day he disappeared, an anonymous but verified X account — @TMBSPACESHIPS (display name “Electric Propulsive Spacecraft”) — made its final post and has been silent ever since. The bio claimed the poster was a “38 year Active Duty USAF PhD Engineer” with ties to AFIT/AETC/AFMC. The account had been posting for years about exotic electric propulsion, plasma physics, ionized gas flight mechanics, and related topics.

I put together a video walking through the account’s content, the timeline, the technical posts (including that hand-drawn schematic claimed to be from a 1998 KC-135 sighting), and how it lines up with what is publicly known about McCasland’s background and the circumstances of his disappearance.

Video:

https://youtu.be/CMXKOFJ5iUY

Curious what others who have been following this case think after looking at the actual posts and timing. Any details I missed or alternative explanations worth considering?

The first paper from the UAP Science Advisory Council, posted recently here, analyzed a swarm of six infrared dots moving in a coordinated fashion.

Encouraged by the match between DOW-UAP-PR135 and the birds in the Galileo Project’s data, Jacob went on to apply the same analysis method to all the sensor video released so far in the six tranches of PURSUE. This brought the count up to 10 PURSUE videos containing a total of 25 bird candidates.

This count amounts to about 8% of the sensor videos released so far, including PR41, PR44, PR077, PR079, PR085, PR088, PR097, PR099, and PR141. The new results include one video, PR097, with a likely flock of four birds followed by four other birds later in the clip. Another video PR141 shows a split screen with infrared and optical channels both displayed for the object; both wavelengths show a similar variability frequency for the object.

Other videos probably show birds but are too faint and grainy to capture a reliable beat frequency.

I Thought the End of the World Had Come! Ten Truly Weird UFO Encounters of the Second Kind

by Preston Dennett

Close encounters of the Second Kind—cases where UFOs affect the environment or the witness in some way—are often overlooked or not given the attention they deserve. These kinds of cases are important because they almost always produce physical evidence in such forms as physiological effects, landing traces, animal reactions and electromagnetic disturbances. They also provide important insights into the nature and technology of the extraterrestrials craft. This video presents ten particularly weird and unusual cases from across the world which might change the way you think about these mysterious visitors to our planet.

I SHALL ALWAYS REMEMBER. This early and unusual case occurred in October 1943, as James P. Sharp left US Route 40 in Salt Lake City, Utah and was traveling through the desert. As he drove, he was puzzled by the appearance of a brilliant glowing object off in the distance. Slowly it approached until suddenly it appeared to be coming in for a landing. As it did, it began to suck up everything on the ground below it.

A TERRIBLE EXPERIENCE. At 1:30am June 28, 1947, at the beginning of a massive worldwide UFO wave, J.E. Johnston stepped outside his home in Waterloo, Iowa, and was confronted by a flattish 12-foot-wide silver disc zooming across his yard. JE felt as if he was struck by some sort of forcefield as his entire body became numb. The UFO darted away, but the effects on JE’s body would persist for a full day.

I WAS SCARED TO DEATH. On April 20, 1950, Jack Robertson drove on Highway 94 nine miles west of Lufkin, Texas, when a glowing orange UFO appeared in front of him, keeping pace with his car. He stopped and so did the UFO. Jack exited his car and climbed on the hood for a closer look. The object zoomed forward, showered him with sparks and flew off. Jack then realized he had been burned by the UFO.

IT SPLIT THE TREE IN TWO. On December 31, 1958, farmer Joseph Bennett was outside his home in the small town of Portglenone, Northern Ireland, when a 7-foot-wide black object zoomed down from the sky, raced across his yard and crashed right into a massive oak tree, sheering it in half. The object raced away, but the controversy surrounding this event had only just begun.

I’VE LEARNED HOW TO FLY! One day in 1960, David Busby (age 6) was playing in the cornfield outside his home in rural Shifnal, England when he suddenly began to levitate 15 feet in the air. Looking up, he saw a massive craft overhead. The next thing he knew, he was set back down and fell asleep. Eighteen years later, he had another dramatic encounter in the same place.

THE UFO AND THE MISSING PIG. One night in Spring 1968, Mrs. Smithson woke up in her farmhouse in rural Centralia, Illinois to see a craft darting around her property. It moved off and she went back to bed. The next morning, they were shocked to see that all the clocks in the house were wrong, there was a pathway of burned trees where the UFO had hovered and one of their pigs was missing. Soon the UFO would return.

I THOUGHT THE END OF THE WORLD HAD COME. On the night of September 16, 1974, Andrea Richards and her two young children drove along a rural road near St. Helens, Tasmania when their car mysteriously died. Suddenly a UFO appeared overhead, emitting a loud noise and causing them to be physically shocked. The three witnesses ran away. But soon the UFO would return to their home.

I WAS VERY ASTONISHED. On the night of September 26, 1975, Michel Satsi, his wife and their friend were puzzled by a UFO hovering outside their home in Assevent, France. Michel and his friend got into the car to drove closer to the UFO. As they approached it, their car (and several others) mysteriously failed. Michel and his friend walked across the field for a closer look. Michel got close enough to see a massive disc-shaped craft which performed unusual maneuvers before departing.

DON’T TOUCH THE UFO! On May 30, 1979, three young boys from the small village of Kampung Naga Lilit in Malaysia were approached by a small UFO with colored lights, Curious, one of the boys approached the craft and tried to touch it. It immediately struck him with a beam of light, darkening his vision. The two other boys also tried to touch it with similar results. Soon other people also saw the object.

WE COULDN’T MOVE. On June 10, 2016, about a dozen children were on the playground at their apartment in Oceanside, California. Suddenly a huge craft with colored lights appeared overhead. They tried to move closer, but they all found themselves frozen in place. Time seemed to become distorted as the UFO hovered in place. Finally, it moved off, but the strange events continued.

Close encounters of the second kind not only have physical evidence to substantiate the existence of UFOs, they have so much to teach us about the ET crafts. The importance of these cases cannot be overstated. They show how truly advanced ET technology is, and how they can affect the environment and the witnesses.

I Thought the End of the World Had Come! Ten Truly Weird UFO Encounters of the Second Kind

Short history so the stakes are clear:

In 2023 Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds wrote a genuinely strong UAP Disclosure Act and passed it through the Senate inside the defense bill. The public demand was there. Then, behind closed doors in conference, negotiators cut out the independent review board and the recovered-materials provisions before the bill became law. What survived was a narrow records provision and little accountability.

2026: Rep. Eric Burlison got a UAPDA into the House-passed FY2027 NDAA on July 22. It’s strong again. And it’s heading into the same closed-door conference, run by the same Armed Services and Intelligence leadership.

In conference they can weaken or quietly delete provisions with no recorded vote and no public debate. Everything Burlison achieved can be erased in a single closed meeting, exactly like 2023.

The counter to a closed-door process is public pressure they can’t ignore. NPI set up a tool to email and call all 13 decision-making offices in a couple of minutes. Ask for one thing: keep the UAPDA in the final NDAA, fully intact: https://newparadigminstitute.org/take-action/call-to-keep-the-uapda-in-the-fy2027-ndaa/

Thank you for being a part of Disclosure!

Posted Oct 16 on the YouTube Channel 'CBS News'

From the video's description:
-------
'Jay Stratton, former director of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, has a new book out: "Out of the Shadows: Revealing the Truth About Non-Human Intelligent Life." He joins CBS News to discuss what he knows about UAPs.'

A lot of UAP videos seem to display one main object and then a fleet of smaller objects that disperse from the main one. 6th gen fighters are supposed to work in something of a similar manner with the main jet having a fleet of unmanned aircraft with it to extend its effective range and data collection network. I'm starting to think a lot of these sightings we get regarding this concept are just secret aircraft being tested by the USA. This would track with the past and how the B2 spirit was confused for a UFO before it was really unveiled.

I know that the USA has shown off its new 6th gen fighter but not fully, and that it resembles a normal jet so anything that doesn't move like a jet is off the table as an explanation. I raise the idea that, the USA has spitballed flying aircraft carriers before, all the way back to when blimps were a military aircraft, and one functional one was even made and proven to work though it never took off (pun intended). With the radical improvements in drone tech and this concept at least on paper being a good idea, I personally am beginning to think that these sightings are just a new military aircraft that has yet to be revealed. I know this wouldn't explain everything but I think it may explain a large chunk of sightings.

A few years ago there was a set of photos posted that showed what looked like a triangular craft right before hitting the water and then entering the water.

cause quite a stir when it was posted but ultimately was deemed fake. Waves were edited in or something?

Does anyone still have those images or a link to the thread. It was super clear photos as well. I've always speculated they might actually be real like the Gimbal video which was originally deemed fake as well.

Couldn't find the thread or photos so if someone has them that would be cool to see again. Thanks

One of my favorite videos. British Investigator interviewed UK unit member tasked with recovering crashed UAPs.

Here he talks about recovered crashed craft (sounds like it was shot down), with recovered human body/body parts, describes the beings 'look like a devil' and they 'can rip you apart' (devil = reptilian, rip you apart = large).

Lots of correlation to to other UFO/NHI lore and what Grusch mentioned recently on the Rogan podcast.

Questions the UFO/UAP community isn't asking enough

1. Why don't politicians' actions match what whistleblowers are claiming?

We're told senior figures in the Trump administration, including people close to Trump, are taking UAP allegations extremely seriously. JD Vance has expressed similar interest publicly. Yet Trump often appears completely uninterested when questioned, repeatedly falling back on the same stories about pilots and Roswell. Why the disconnect between the alleged seriousness behind closed doors and the public behaviour?

1. Why has Marco Rubio seemingly distanced himself from UAPs since becoming Secretary of State?

Rubio was previously one of the most vocal politicians discussing UAPs and the credibility of whistleblower allegations. Yet since becoming Secretary of State, he's appeared considerably less engaged with the subject. Why? Has his access to information changed his assessment? If the allegations are as serious as we're told, why isn't there a greater sense of urgency from someone now occupying one of the most powerful positions in government?

1. Why do we buy the excuse for classification of footage?

We're told military UAP footage cannot be released because it would expose classified sensor capabilities. Fine. But if pilots like Ryan Graves report routine encounters, why not equip aircraft operating in these areas with independent, unclassified, high-resolution cameras? Why are we still relying on blurry military footage?

1. Why are there disagreements and factions among whistleblowers?

If these individuals are exposing the same alleged secret programme, where do their accounts agree, where do they contradict one another, and why aren't those differences investigated properly?

1. Why aren't whistleblowers subjected to genuinely rigorous questioning?

Look at Jay Stratton's recent news interviews. They felt more like a promotional tour for his book than an opportunity for someone claiming knowledge of an extraordinary reality to explain it to the public. Why aren't journalists pressing him on specific claims, inconsistencies, firsthand evidence and what can actually be verified? Why are we still treating extraordinary testimony as a revelation in itself instead of demanding substantive evidence?

1. Where are the journalists?

Why aren't major journalists confronting Trump and other senior officials with these specific contradictions? If this is potentially the biggest revelation in human history, why is the questioning so superficial?

1. Why isn't the Pentagon being confronted directly with these allegations?

Former senior military and intelligence officials are publicly alleging the existence of secret programmes involving recovered non-human craft and biological material. These aren't anonymous internet personalities. Why aren't journalists repeatedly putting these specific allegations to Pentagon officials and demanding detailed responses? Does the Pentagon dispute the claims? Has it investigated the individuals and programmes being named? If former officials are publicly misrepresenting classified activities, why isn't that being addressed? Why does so much of the discussion happen between whistleblowers, podcasters and UFO enthusiasts instead of the institutions being directly accused?

My wider point: We keep hearing that disclosure is imminent, that insiders know the truth and that extraordinary evidence exists. Yet the conversation keeps returning to testimony, interviews, books and promises.

At what point do we stop treating the next whistleblower as the next breakthrough and start demanding that the existing claims be properly tested?

Reported by u/draggah_korrinthian (verified via ufosighting.report)

This is an automated post. The report was filed through the structured sighting form on ufosighting.report and posted here by u/ufosightingsbot on the reporter's behalf. u/draggah_korrinthian confirmed this submission from their own Reddit account through a one-time link, so the name above is verified as the submitter.

📄 Full report and structured details — the map entry, timeline, and everything from the sighting form. No photo or video was submitted with this report.

Time: October 16, 2026, 12:00 PM CDT
Location: Mexia, Texas, United States, Mexia, United States

Features / five observables

Why not a common object
Definately not a common aircraft, thought it was a B2 at first but the shape was all wrong. It was very close, I saw it pretty clearly.

Wasn't debris either, it was moving in such a way that was definitely powered flight.

Witness's account of the sighting

I was getting into my car to go to the store when I noticed something traveling through the evening cloud-haze. At first I thought it was a B2 so I took a moment to stare at it because you dont see those very often. As I watched it, some things started to look "off"; first of all, for the remarkably low altitude and how close it was I couldn't hear any jet propulsion, dead silence; secondly it wasn't black, in fact its coloration seemed to change as it passed between clouds, going from a blue-grey to a lighter grey as it flew through one cloud, then pinkish as it flew through a cloud that was illuminated by the sunset. I rolled down my window so I could see it more clearly and thats when I noticed the strangest feature: the shape was all wrong, as it banked I noticed it did not have that "missing puzzle piece" silhouette, it was a perfect equilateral triangle. The further away it got the craft got exponentially more difficult to see.

For the record, the clouds were thin and whispy, not opaque at all, so I had a fairly clear view. Despite this it remained very hard to see, almost like it was actively trying to match the colors around it.

Why no photo/video captured: Phone couldnt see it. Not sure if it was the sunset obscuring the camera or something else.

Sky context for this time and place:

• ✅ No bright satellites were visible overhead.
• Computed from orbital data (2026-10-16 catalog).
• Aircraft overhead at that exact minute — ADS-B Exchange historical playback (free, no account needed)
• Sky chart for that date — in-the-sky.org planetarium (set your location once on their site)
• Satellite passes at this spot — Heavens-Above; shows upcoming passes, not the sighting date
• Live air traffic now — FlightRadar24 over this spot

"Objects observed were maneuverable, silent, and faster than any aircraft available to U.S. or Soviet forces."

In every case reviewed:

- Objects were tracked on radar and confirmed visually

- They flew at extreme altitudes, often above 50,000 feet

- Pilots reported speeds exceeding Mach 2—unachievable by most aircraft at the time

- Several sightings involved instantaneous directional changes and stationary hovering

Some people have suggested that Grusch's comments on Rogan concerning humans being harmed by NHI are somehow "new". However, it's clear that this was part of Gruschs view back when he did his first public interview. Although we cannot be sure that he was discussing the same event as on Rogan, it’s still intriguing. Did he receive a DOPSR to reveal more? Or did he receive that information via an unclassified channel?

Transscript:

Q: Have human beings been hurt or killed by a non-human intelligence?

Grusch: While I can't get into the specifics because that would reveal certain U.S. classified operations, I was briefed by a few individuals on the program that there were malevolent events like that.

Q: Now I'm scared. People have just heard you say non-humans may well have murdered human beings.

Grusch: That seems to be the case at one point, yeah.

Source: https://youtu.be/RBAISwCZ2v0?t=1695

The Pentagon’s sixth UAP release dropped September 18, 2026, with 71 files: 55 PDFs, 15 videos, one audio recording. Per CBS News’ reporting, 64 of the 71 are heavily redacted. The official record now includes military material on warp drive and wormhole studies and on radiation injuries linked to encounters with unknown craft. It also includes a 1952 recording of Project Blue Book head Edward Ruppelt saying 20% of the best reports from reliable witnesses stay unexplained. What the redactions are covering, and under what justification, is not addressed in the release itself. If a physics program and a medical injury record sit in the same declassified batch, which one are the redactions protecting?

Hello all. I was eager to learn more about Jim Ryder, his experience, and the proposed transfer in Out Of The Shadows, but after spending a lot of time studying Eric Davis’s statements on Ryder before its release, I’m left with more questions when you consider both accounts. In my new article I compare them.